Teams

GPawlush (Weddington)

2023 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 8.5 Men - Thurs PM

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-10-06vs FMasucci (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMark Griffey / Kevin Miller vs Rohan Ranadive / Premkumar Jagannathan6-0, 6-3
2023-09-21vs BChriscoe (Southampton)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMark Griffey / Patrick Murchison vs Bo Chriscoe / Aaron Backus6-2, 7-6
2023-09-07vs JClarke/OPunjabi (Col Beatty)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGeorge Pawlush / Mark Griffey vs Brian Morrow / Patrick Keaton2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 8.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Mark Brandon
published
3.87
Robert Major
published
3.83
Randall Miller
published
3.81
Mark Griffey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Kevin Conway
published
3.76
Kevin Miller
published
3.75
Richard Gallagher
published
3.70
Martin Iles
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.67
George Pawlush
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Patrick Murchison
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Conway + Kevin Miller4350% games+4.1% vs expected
Mark Griffey + Martin Iles2343% games−3.4% vs expected
Martin Iles + Kevin Conway3246% games−5.3% vs expected
Patrick Murchison + George Pawlush9857% games−5.3% vs expected
Kevin Conway + George Pawlush2344% games−5.4% vs expected
Patrick Murchison + Martin Iles4357% gamesnot enough data
Mark Griffey + Patrick Murchison4156% gamesnot enough data
Martin Iles + Robert Major3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Brandon
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
Robert Major
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.87
Randall Miller
5W–16L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.83
4
Mark Griffey
59W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
Kevin Conway
21W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
Kevin Miller
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Richard Gallagher
26W–37L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Martin Iles
162W–103L career · 7 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
George Pawlush
67W–64L career · 8 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Patrick Murchison
55W–49L career · 7 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.