Teams

QRRC Pickrel

2025 OH OV FALL A18&O Daytime · 3.5W Monday

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Louisette Abikou
published
3.50
Lisa Metzcar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Carlyn McCarthy
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Megan Oue
published
3.33
Donna Silvert
published
3.31
Emily von Stuckrad-Smolinski
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Ronit Thomeczek
published
3.21
Aimee D'Aloisio
published 3.5
3.21
Stephanie Soller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Maggie Leadman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Sydney Corbean
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Sunhe Rhee
published
3.04
Heather Keighley
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.04
Julie Pickrel
published
3.02
Pamela Disser
published
3.00
Janet Graul
published
2.99
Michelle Pickrel
published
Emily Hudson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronit Thomeczek + Emily von Stuckrad-Smolinski4357% games+11.0% vs expected
Maggie Leadman + Carlyn McCarthy8362% games+9.8% vs expected
Megan Oue + Sunhe Rhee4358% games+9.4% vs expected
Heather Keighley + Megan Oue8263% games+8.3% vs expected
Aimee D'Aloisio + Maggie Leadman51047% games+3.5% vs expected
Michelle Pickrel + Donna Silvert5157% games+2.7% vs expected
Michelle Pickrel + Maggie Leadman3352% games+2.0% vs expected
Stephanie Soller + Carlyn McCarthy19954% games+2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Louisette Abikou
42W–26L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Lisa Metzcar
349W–155L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Carlyn McCarthy
152W–128L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Megan Oue
95W–85L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Donna Silvert
151W–61L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Emily von Stuckrad-Smolinski
106W–88L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Ronit Thomeczek
73W–102L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Aimee D'Aloisio
114W–139L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Stephanie Soller
74W–92L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Maggie Leadman
158W–141L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Sydney Corbean
78W–58L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Sunhe Rhee
77W–75L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Heather Keighley
32W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Julie Pickrel
32W–25L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.04
Pamela Disser
74W–97L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Janet Graul
39W–44L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Michelle Pickrel
92W–116L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Emily Hudson
37W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.