Teams

Sets Pistols 4.0

2022 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-05-11vs 2C Tennis BumsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnthony Saulino / Richard Braithwaite vs George Allen / Corey Garcia2-6, 1-6
2022-05-03vs Cerveza por favorLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnthony Saulino / Richard Braithwaite vs Chris Burke / James Elliott7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-19vs Miller Time >40Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJay Blackford / Richard Braithwaite vs Scott Anders / Stephen Sowinski1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Over Served92341024304
2Early Risers92311332339
32C Tennis Bums92261841353
4ETC Deuce Bags65251947417
5Cerveza por favor65222255418
6Miller Time >4065182657417
7Buffoons56192551415
8Club Pura Vida47202456424
9Old Enough to Know Better38192559429
10Chak De Boise Turbo29143063463
11Sets Pistols 4.029133166467

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dan Wold
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Chad Trued
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.57
Bob Haycock
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.54
Jason Jones
published 4
3.44
Micah Vogt
published 3.5
3.36
Anthony Saulino
published 3.5
Casey Boren
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
David Andrews
published 3.5
2.99
Jay Blackford
published 3.5
Jeffrey Raulston
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
Richard Braithwaite
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Blackford + Anthony Saulino61045% games+1.0% vs expected
Chad Trued + Bob Haycock231455% games−1.6% vs expected
Casey Boren + Anthony Saulino14655% gamesnot enough data
Casey Boren + Bob Haycock8648% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Raulston + Bob Haycock4950% gamesnot enough data
Casey Boren + Dan Wold3642% gamesnot enough data
Dan Wold + Jeffrey Raulston6355% gamesnot enough data
Dan Wold + Micah Vogt2644% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dan Wold
22W–43L career · 15 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Chad Trued
67W–77L career · 15 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Bob Haycock
145W–102L career · type A · 15 lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.57
4
Jason Jones
54W–64L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Micah Vogt
78W–61L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Anthony Saulino
113W–63L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Casey Boren
84W–99L career · 14 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
David Andrews
11W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jay Blackford
40W–46L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.99
Jeffrey Raulston
52W–45L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Braithwaite
17W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.