Teams

HOF: Ultimate Warriors!/Pietz/Truskoski

2021 RI Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.0 Men 1

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-24vs EB: GarceauWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeath Berkowitz / Alexander Stalley vs Leo Garceau / Scott Francoeur6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDouglas Lowenstein / Jason Truskoski vs Adam Cargin / Jarod Zizza4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesTheodore Pietz vs Liam Zizza6-2, 6-1
2021-07-23vs RP: Conforti/MarcelloLost 04
L#1 DoublesHeath Berkowitz / Alexander Stalley vs Keith Atchinson / Roland Gustavson7-5, 5-7, 0-3
L#1 SinglesOmar Hameed vs Jason Conforti6-3, 1-4
L#2 DoublesDouglas Lowenstein / Jason Truskoski vs Daniel Greene / Christopher Marcello3-6, 7-6, 0-3
L#3 DoublesMatt Johnson / Theodore Pietz vs Jeffrey Johnson / Andy Strickler3-6, 2-6
2021-07-18vs RP: BrazenorWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeath Berkowitz / Hunter Norton vs Chris Ross / Howard Yang5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesOtniel Lopes vs Sanjeeva Chetty6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTheodore Pietz / Matt Johnson vs Neil Chapralis / Adam Talman7-6, 4-2
2021-07-09vs EB: GarceauSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDouglas Lowenstein / Jason Truskoski vs Adam Cargin / Jarod Zizza6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Jones / Theodore Pietz vs Jay Essary / Bruce Fischer3-6, 6-1, 6-3
2021-07-01vs FC: Chisholm/RajabiunLost 04
L#1 DoublesTheodore Pietz / John Jones vs Khamphanh Savatdy / Cesar Fernandes3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCallum McLaughlin / Mark Gelsinger vs David Rangel / Oliver Doyle3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesOtniel Lopes vs Alex Bourque3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJason Truskoski / Douglas Lowenstein vs David Rajabiun / Andrew Chisholm0-6, 5-7
2021-06-26vs FC: Chisholm/RajabiunSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDouglas Lowenstein / Alexander Stalley vs Alex Bourque / David Rajabiun3-6, 7-6, 1-2
L#1 SinglesOmar Hameed vs Khameron Savatdy1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMark Gelsinger / Theodore Pietz vs Oliver Doyle / Matthew Drolet7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTodd Schuck / Jason Truskoski vs Andrew Chisholm / Russell Wyatt6-4, 1-6, 7-5
2021-06-19vs RP: Conforti/MarcelloLost 13
L#1 DoublesAlexander Stalley / Heath Berkowitz vs Keith Atchinson / John Deffley4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJason Truskoski / Douglas Lowenstein vs Jason Conforti / Guilherme Serrano3-6, 6-4, 4-3
L#2 SinglesOmar Hameed vs Zac Goldberg1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCallum McLaughlin / Hunter Norton vs Roland Gustavson / Daniel Greene6-4, 3-6, 1-6
2021-06-11vs RP: BrazenorLost 12
L#1 DoublesTheodore Pietz / Jason Truskoski vs Jason Cordeiro / Adam Talman1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMark Gelsinger / Callum McLaughlin vs David Bagus / Howard Yang7-5, 3-6, 6-1
L#2 SinglesHunter Norton vs Benjamin Kahn2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Heath Berkowitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Jason Truskoski
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.71
Otniel Lopes
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.69
Callum McLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Douglas Lowenstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
Theodore Pietz
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Alexander Stalley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Hunter Norton
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Gelsinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Omar Hameed
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Todd Schuck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Truskoski + Theodore Pietz0733% games−12.4% vs expected
Douglas Lowenstein + Jason Truskoski4645% games−14.3% vs expected
Todd Schuck + Jason Truskoski303 matchesnot enough data
Alexander Stalley + Heath Berkowitz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heath Berkowitz
12W–24L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jason Truskoski
58W–57L career · 7 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
Otniel Lopes
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Callum McLaughlin
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Douglas Lowenstein
37W–34L career · 6 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.66
Theodore Pietz
52W–77L career · 16 lines in 2021
64%36%<1%
3.45
Alexander Stalley
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Hunter Norton
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Gelsinger
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Omar Hameed
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Todd Schuck
60W–15L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.