Teams

Mannell - Highland Country Club

2025 Sandhills Tri Level 55 & Over · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-13vs Martin - Lawn and Tennis - 55+Won 10
W#3 DoublesKim Hasty / Mary Bonsall vs Sandra Jones / MaryBryan Morgan6-4, 6-4
2025-06-29vs Martin - Lawn and Tennis - 55+Won 10
W#3 DoublesKim Hasty / Mary Bonsall vs MaryBryan Morgan / Del Metcalf6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-06-15vs Martin - Lawn and Tennis - 55+Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndrea Tatman / Catherine Christianson vs Ann Tucker / Del Metcalf6-0, 6-1
2025-06-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndrea Tatman / Susan Edmonds vs Susan Omell / Elizabeth Hasty6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Cindy Goodman
published 4.5
4.21
Amy Perko
published 4.5
4.21
Angela Neal
published 4.5
3.96
Megan Mannell
published
3.77
Andrea Tatman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
3.69
Susan Edmonds
published
3.56
Tara Platt
published
3.50
Mary Howard
published
3.45
Mary Bonsall
published
3.37
Kim Hasty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Marion Bryan
published
3.18
Dawn Dixon
published 3.5
3.10
Carolyn Zahran
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Hasty + Mary Bonsall6167% games+1.6% vs expected
Tara Platt + Megan Mannell5159% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Tatman + Kim Hasty3357% gamesnot enough data
Marion Bryan + Susan Edmonds134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Perko + Catherine Christianson314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Edmonds + Kim Hasty224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Edmonds + Catherine Christianson314 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Tatman + Dawn Dixon134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cindy Goodman
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Amy Perko
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Angela Neal
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
Megan Mannell
24W–10L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.96
4
Andrea Tatman
77W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Catherine Christianson
21W–29L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Susan Edmonds
34W–30L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Tara Platt
62W–45L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Mary Howard
49W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Mary Bonsall
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Kim Hasty
148W–106L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Marion Bryan
18W–27L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Dawn Dixon
32W–30L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Carolyn Zahran
10W–18L career · type A · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.