Teams

CR GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-19vs WC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesKevin Hodnett / Ken Wartell vs Evan Ela / Roger Overbey6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCharles Fields vs Marty Bruno6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMark Kostecki / Robert Blalock vs Dave Donnell / Martin Atlas3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGlen Erickson / Tim Dagg vs David Garcia / Don Wedlaw5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-07-12vs PRKR BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesMark Kostecki / Ken Wartell vs Patrick Brisch / Chad Smith7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDavid Winkler vs Javier Hernan3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Hodnett / Steve Ortmayer vs Scott Heck / Steve Caffrey1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChris Horger / Tim Dagg vs Chris Young / Rick Wolfgang4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-07-09vs CACI GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMark Kostecki / David Winkler vs Bryan Kortum / Andy Rinehart6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCharles Fields vs Julio Casillas3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTim Dagg / Chris Horger vs Jeff Johnson / Thomas Samuelson2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGlen Erickson / Steve Ortmayer vs David Burdick / Edward Sullivan6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-06-28vs SSLT BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesKen Wartell / Kevin Hodnett vs Richard Stromp / Reagan Harper6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesIsidre Baques vs Charles Phanumphai0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGlen Erickson / Steve Ortmayer vs Paul Lee / Jeff Apple6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMike Kilman / Chris Horger vs Paul Yaple / Craig Tobin6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2021-06-21vs CPV GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesMark Kostecki / Kevin Hodnett vs David Johnson / Mark Voss6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCharles Fields vs Dave Smith6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTim Dagg / Chris Horger vs Eamon Twomey / Alex Mercer5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Winkler / Steve Ortmayer vs Matt Westphal / Lance Bourque1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-14vs WC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMark Kostecki / Kevin Hodnett vs Evan Ela / Gary Murphy6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesIsidre Baques vs Scott Kilpatrick2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTim Dagg / Charles Fields vs Walter Sulmeisters / Richard Heim3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMike Kilman / Glen Erickson vs David Garcia / Marty Bruno6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-06-07vs PRKR BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesGlen Erickson / Kevin Hodnett vs Tho Nguyen / Mark Hollenbeck6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDavid Winkler vs Javier Hernan2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTim Dagg / Charles Fields vs Rick Wolfgang / Jeff Bille6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMike Kilman / Robert Blalock vs Chad Smith / Scott Heck1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GLDN GOLD52171128237
2CR GREEN43171129225
3TTA GOLD34111737259
4SSD RED25101838296

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Mark Kostecki
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Charles Fields
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Chris Horger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Isidre Baques
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.65
David Winkler
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Ken Wartell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Kevin Hodnett
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.39
Glen Erickson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Tim Dagg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Mike Kilman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Blalock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Steve Ortmayer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Kostecki + Chris Horger5257% games+10.1% vs expected
Mark Kostecki + Tim Dagg3355% games+0.7% vs expected
David Winkler + Kevin Hodnett5648% games+0.6% vs expected
Glen Erickson + David Winkler21043% games−1.1% vs expected
David Winkler + Chris Horger6452% games−2.4% vs expected
Mark Kostecki + Kevin Hodnett282252% games−3.0% vs expected
Tim Dagg + Chris Horger6547% games−8.7% vs expected
Glen Erickson + Tim Dagg3541% games−13.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mark Kostecki
97W–54L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Charles Fields
10W–10L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Chris Horger
38W–23L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Isidre Baques
18W–16L career · 2 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
David Winkler
45W–65L career · 4 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
Ken Wartell
11W–21L career · 3 lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Kevin Hodnett
83W–58L career · 6 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Glen Erickson
30W–28L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
4
Tim Dagg
47W–39L career · type S · 6 lines in 2021
87%13%<1%
3.35
Mike Kilman
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Blalock
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Steve Ortmayer
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.