Teams

TLTC-Smith/Jesse

2024 One Doubles-Summer · 3.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-11vs Lane/Monson-Scott SquaredWon 10
W#1 DoublesNathan Englund / David Smith vs Scott Lane / Scott Monson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-10vs HewittLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Smith / Nathan Englund vs Justin Martin / Jin Park0-6, 5-7
2024-07-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesMark Lindquist / David Smith vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesNathan Englund / Philip Jesse vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-01vs SWW-KradjanLost 01
L#1 DoublesPhilip Jesse / Nathan Englund vs Christopher Kradjan / Brady Miller2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-10vs Lane/Monson-Scott SquaredWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Smith / Philip Jesse vs Scott Lane / Scott Monson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-22vs HewittWon 10
W#1 DoublesNathan Englund / Mark Lindquist vs Stephen Hewitt / Justin Martin6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SWW-Kradjan8080133
2Hewitt5353661
3TLTC-Smith/Jesse5353859
4Lane/Monson-Scott Squared26261265
5Fourtner-D4s08081696

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Mark Lindquist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Philip Jesse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Nathan Englund
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.62
David Smith
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mark Lindquist
48W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Philip Jesse
6W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Nathan Englund
5W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
David Smith
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.