Teams

Moss/Dawson/Nashville

2025 Mixed 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Mixed - Sunday

15 players · average NTRP 3.30 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-20vs Vandever/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesTraci Gilbert-Stafford / Patrick Ainsworth vs Hannah Harrison / Jesse Harrison6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRyan Moss / Cynthia Madson vs Kellie Sallis / Kenny Sallis6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTheo Smith / Kerry Elam vs Camille Mitchell / Wade Mitchell5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-21vs Long/NashvilleSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTheo Smith / Kaelin Cramer vs Matt Lewis / Lisa Rota6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesConnor Horn / Megan de la O vs David Long / Morgan Johnston2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-15vs Vandever/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesClaudia Paz / Alex Paz vs Maggie Vandever / Taylor Vandever6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMatt Cole / Kaelin Cramer vs Hannah Harrison / Jesse Harrison6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRyan Moss / Cynthia Madson vs Sarah White / Joshua White6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed - Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Theo Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Claudia Paz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ben Helms
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Matt Cole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Rebekah Carroll
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Traci Gilbert-Stafford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Alex Paz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
2.96
Kerry Elam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Connor Horn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Nicholas Cook
published
2.91
Kaelin Cramer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Megan de la O
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Cynthia Madson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Patrick Ainsworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Theo Smith
18W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
3.5
Claudia Paz
25W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Ben Helms
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Matt Cole
25W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Rebekah Carroll
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Traci Gilbert-Stafford
32W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
3.5
Alex Paz
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy
29W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kerry Elam
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Connor Horn
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Nicholas Cook
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Kaelin Cramer
30W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Megan de la O
21W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Cynthia Madson
23W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Patrick Ainsworth
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.