Teams

SAN JOSE SR CW7.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Shashi Navar
published
3.73
Daniela Nalesso
published 4
3.63
Lara Norman-Stowers
published
3.41
Pauline Teunissen
published
3.27
Elyse Goldman
published
3.22
Jane Ensor
published
3.20
Dana Knapp
published 3.5
3.19
Amanda Holmquist
published 3.5
3.17
Mary Jo Lee
published
3.13
Barbara Westergren
published 3.5
3.13
Jan Immer
published
3.03
Kristin Giammona
published
2.87
Claudia Parker
published 3.5
Kathleen Aldridge
published
Sherry Keogh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Immer + Claudia Parker044 matchesnot enough data
Mary Jo Lee + Dana Knapp134 matchesnot enough data
Mary Jo Lee + Jane Ensor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shashi Navar
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Daniela Nalesso
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Lara Norman-Stowers
19W–17L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
Pauline Teunissen
21W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Elyse Goldman
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Jane Ensor
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Dana Knapp
15W–18L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Amanda Holmquist
2W–21L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Mary Jo Lee
10W–26L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Barbara Westergren
6W–17L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jan Immer
2W–17L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Kristin Giammona
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Claudia Parker
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
2.87
Kathleen Aldridge
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherry Keogh
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.