Teams

Mt Vintage Plantation - Risher

2025 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring '25 · Men 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-29vs RVP - BaldySplit 11
W#1 DoublesMatthew Griffin / Kaj-Reem Robinson vs Michael Baldy / Jeremy Lacey6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKyle Caver vs Tucker Braddy0-6, 0-6
2025-03-15vs RVP - BaldyWon 30
W#1 DoublesFain Dye / Craig Adamski vs Bajio Antony / Jeremy Lacey4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShawn Risher / Sam Stevens vs Russell Vaughn / Nathan Morgan0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaj-Reem Robinson / Matthew Griffin vs Caleb Bell / Bert Lacey7-5, 6-4
2025-03-08vs CCRC - KramerLost 12
L#1 DoublesFain Dye / Craig Adamski vs Nikhil Narendran / Sammy Crawford7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Whitwell / Jeff Johnston vs Keith Finch / Steve Cassell6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKaj-Reem Robinson / Burton Eichel vs David Hartmann / Tom Battey6-7, 3-6
2025-03-01vs Fleming TC - ElamLost 13
L#1 DoublesJeff Johnston / Burton Eichel vs Hunter Reid / Mark Coleman2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCraig Adamski vs Shiquan Brown3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaj-Reem Robinson / John Whitwell vs Blake Elam / Ross Lyons2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesFain Dye / Jaye Cohen vs Cory Muncill / Roberto Gonzalez6-3, 6-3
2025-02-22vs RVP - BaldyWon 30
W#1 DoublesBurton Eichel / Matthew Griffin vs Henry Lam / Serguei Kovalenko6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCraig Adamski / Fain Dye vs Jeremy Lacey / Nathan Morgan6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShawn Risher / Jeff Johnston vs Matthew Queen / Bert Lacey6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-15vs CCRC - KramerLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Whitwell / Fain Dye vs Sammy Crawford / James Gregory2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKaj-Reem Robinson / Burton Eichel vs Mark Blakeman / Steve Cassell6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShawn Risher / Sam Stevens vs Keith Finch / Joe Giron3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-10vs Fleming TC - ElamWon 30
W#1 DoublesCraig Adamski / Fain Dye vs Cory Muncill / Hunter Reid2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShawn Risher / Sam Stevens vs Bradley Carter / Ross Lyons6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKyle Caver / John Whitwell vs Roberto Gonzalez / Mark Coleman2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-08vs Fleming TC - ElamSplit 22
L#1 SinglesSterling Hamilton vs Hyon Ko4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJaye Cohen / Kaj-Reem Robinson vs Joseph Sheaff / Bradley Carter3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKyle Caver vs Shiquan Brown2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesFain Dye / Craig Adamski vs Mark Coleman / Roberto Gonzalez6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-25vs CCRC - KramerLost 04
L#1 DoublesSam Stevens / Shawn Risher vs Tom Battey / Kyle Perry4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCraig Adamski vs Mark Blakeman3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFain Dye / Burton Eichel vs Tom Shimp / David Hartmann4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKyle Caver / Matthew Griffin vs James Gregory / Sammy Crawford2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Sterling Hamilton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.41
John Whitwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Jaye Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Craig Adamski
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Burton Eichel
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Fain Dye
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kaj-Reem Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kyle Caver
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Sam Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Shawn Risher
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Adamski + Fain Dye7354% games−5.1% vs expected
Fain Dye + John Whitwell5259% gamesnot enough data
Shawn Risher + Sam Stevens2539% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sterling Hamilton
35W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.50
John Whitwell
21W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.41
Jaye Cohen
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Craig Adamski
28W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Burton Eichel
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Fain Dye
39W–23L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Kaj-Reem Robinson
11W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kyle Caver
6W–8L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sam Stevens
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Risher
3W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.