Teams

Maggin - Lakewood CC

2025 Montgomery Doubles Fall Women · Montgomery Doubles Fall 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.86 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-04vs Ialeggio - Edge PlusWon 10
W#2 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Catherine Zimmermann vs Kiersten Butterfield / Shannon Hockey6-3, 6-0
2025-11-20vs Birchfield - Smart Aces 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Fulton / Keelin Gallagher vs Errin Matechak / Odette Clark Campbell6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-11-14vs Bell - Love AllWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarrie Rost / Catherine Zimmermann vs Li Ives / Shirley Hsieh-Lau4-6, 5-2
2025-11-10vs horowitz - BCC AcesWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristine Koy / Laurie Stien vs Bridget Foist / Elizabeth Hunter5-7, 2-3
W#2 DoublesCheryl Hays / Christina Mendelson vs Jennifer Kress / E Molly Hemsley6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJenna Harar / Carrie Rost vs Vicki Herson / Tannaz Poursaeid6-0, 6-2
2025-11-05vs Block Copeland - Aspen HillWon 10
W#1 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Rebecca Sirody vs Patricia Block / Victoria Copeland6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-28vs Psacharopoulos - CongressionalSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Rebecca Sirody vs Ann Fowler / Lauren Johnston7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarrie Rost / Catherine Zimmermann vs Natalie Smith / Mary Anne Virostek3-6, 6-7
2025-10-21vs Yuan - Power SmashLost 01
L#1 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Catherine Zimmermann vs Ellen Lee / Frankie Lawrence6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Fall 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Christina Mendelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Cheryl Hays
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Allison Fulton
published 4
Amory Barnes
published 4
Anna Maggin
published 4
Christine Koy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Carrie Rost
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.73
Keelin Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Ann Kopsidas
published 4
3.73
Meredith Berlin
published
3.70
Laurie Stien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Catherine Zimmermann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Jenna Harar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elana Steinberg
published 3.5
Nancy Eisner
published
Rebecca Sirody
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keelin Gallagher + Catherine Zimmermann6355% games−6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Mendelson
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Cheryl Hays
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Allison Fulton
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Amory Barnes
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Anna Maggin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christine Koy
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carrie Rost
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.74
4
Keelin Gallagher
77W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Ann Kopsidas
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Meredith Berlin
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Laurie Stien
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Catherine Zimmermann
17W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Jenna Harar
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Elana Steinberg
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Eisner
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Sirody
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.