Teams

SKY - Finnin

2022 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult Women 55 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-26vs FK - Bouffard/PetersonWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnne Finnin / Irma Buttermore vs Margie McLellan / Marianne Zitnick3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesRayetta Spina / Judy Weber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-13vs FK - Bouffard/PetersonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJudy Weber / Rayetta Spina vs Julie Haynes / Deborah Borge-Shaffer6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-03-05vs SKY - PrittSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRayetta Spina / Terri DeMartino vs Tana Hubbard / Ellen Barnes4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Henny David vs Petrea Coleman / Gail Cooper4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-02-20vs Marion - Villages/Eng/McCoyWon 10
W#1 DoublesRayetta Spina / Terri DeMartino vs Jill Eng / Diane Josselyn7-6, 6-0
2022-02-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Tripp / Irma Buttermore vs Sally Demontfort / Antoinette van Den Hoogen6-4, 6-3
2022-01-29vs SKY - PrittSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRayetta Spina / Judy Weber vs Tana Hubbard / Ellen Barnes1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Suteera Chaisumrej Joyce vs Stephanie Gose / Maureen Maloney6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-15vs Marion - Villages/Eng/McCoyWon 10
W#1 DoublesRayetta Spina / Judy Weber vs Diane Josselyn / Lisa Lee4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Carol Hirsch
published 3.5
3.24
Irma Buttermore
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.02
Judy Weber
published
2.97
Henny David
published 3.5
2.80
Michelle Tripp
published
Linda Johnson
published
Lynne Finman
published
Rayetta Spina
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Tracy Shisler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irma Buttermore + Rayetta Spina213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Hirsch
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Irma Buttermore
86W–80L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Judy Weber
0W–12L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.02
3.5
Henny David
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Michelle Tripp
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Linda Johnson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynne Finman
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rayetta Spina
110W–77L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Suteera Chaisumrej Joyce
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracy Shisler
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.