Teams

Randoll/Maack

2026 FW Combo Tournament · 6.5 Ladies

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-24vs FerrellLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeah Truitt / Cindy Maack vs Bianca Swegler / Cara Kist4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNoelle Ratliff / Lisa Polly vs Bree Mcalister / Heidi Ferrell2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLauren Eutsler / Erika Steinman vs Barbarita Nieri / Kari Fox6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-05-23vs SeayLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatherine Wayles / Leslie Maddie vs Cindy Seay / Diana Ahmad7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLauren Eutsler / KELLY SMITH vs Mandy Rhodes / Lindsey Mercer3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesErika Steinman / Lisa Friedrichsen vs Manisone Norkeo / Natasha Chevalier3-6, 3-6
2026-05-23vs WeaverWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeah Truitt / Cindy Maack vs Heidi Weaver / Susan May6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGisella Kaendler / Erika Steinman vs Eva Gregory / Courtney Morawski6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Polly / Lauren Eutsler vs Lori Clark / Deanna Sullivan6-4, 6-1
2026-05-22vs RobinsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesNoelle Ratliff / Lisa Polly vs Stephanie Robinson / Jennifer Smiley6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLeah Truitt / Cindy Maack vs Janet Helsel / Cindy Trammell6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Randoll / Leslie Maddie vs Cecilia Gallardo Solano / Taylor Ratliff3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 6.5 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Seay401118108
2Alsager318411107
3Ferrell318411112
4Robinson227511103
5Brueggemeyer226613113
6Randoll/Maack224816113
7Holt136615118
8Durboraw1321022129
9Weaver043919136

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Noelle Ratliff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Katherine Wayles
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Leah Truitt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.25
Lisa Friedrichsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Gisella Kaendler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Erika Steinman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Lauren Eutsler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Cindy Maack
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Leslie Maddie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Laura Randoll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Lisa Polly
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
KELLY SMITH
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Wayles + Noelle Ratliff6074% games+23.5% vs expected
Cindy Maack + Lisa Polly6260% games+13.4% vs expected
Lauren Eutsler + Noelle Ratliff3254% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Maack + Leah Truitt3257% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Wayles + Laura Randoll033 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Wayles + Leah Truitt303 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Eutsler + Leah Truitt033 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Maack + Erika Steinman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noelle Ratliff
22W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
Katherine Wayles
14W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Leah Truitt
25W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Lisa Friedrichsen
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Gisella Kaendler
16W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Erika Steinman
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Lauren Eutsler
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Cindy Maack
18W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
Leslie Maddie
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.84
Laura Randoll
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.83
Lisa Polly
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
KELLY SMITH
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.