Teams

ACAC- Desouza

2025 Charlottesville Combo Mixed · Charlottesville Combo Mixed 8.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-21vs Weck - Ballievers 8.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesClayton Kallenborn / Joyce Steed vs Daniel Carlson / Joan Carlson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Bayliss / William Manning vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-19vs Weck - Ballievers 8.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTammy Hertel / Clayton Kallenborn vs Thomas Weck / Amy Nolasco0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatthew Lucas / Katherine Haskins vs Joan Carlson / Mark Raffinan6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-09-14vs Weck - Ballievers 8.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesJordan Barr / Joyce Steed vs Lorie Davis / Luke Fairborn7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTammy Hertel / William Manning vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-24vs Weck - Ballievers 8.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesKatherine Haskins / Clayton Kallenborn vs Jennie Chiu / Howell Fendley2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoyce Steed / Matthew Lucas vs Meredith Holmes / Lorenzo Davis6-4, 6-4
2025-08-22vs Weck - Ballievers 8.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJordan Barr / Joyce Steed vs Luke Fairborn / Meredith Holmes4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-17vs Weck - Ballievers 8.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJordan Barr / Joyce Steed vs Reid Phillips / Lindsay Phillips7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMatthew Lucas / Katherine Haskins vs Jennie Chiu / Lorenzo Davis3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesWilliam Manning / Tammy Hertel vs Kimberly Glass / Howell Fendley3-6, 3-6
2025-08-08vs Weck - Ballievers 8.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesJordan Barr / Joyce Steed vs Joan Carlson / Daniel Carlson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Combo Mixed 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Joyce Steed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.90
3.89
Jordan Barr
published
3.80
William Manning
published
3.79
Katherine Haskins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Tammy Hertel
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.72
3.62
Mary Broden
published
3.00
Susan Bayliss
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
2.98
Laura Barnes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Barr + Tammy Hertel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Joyce Steed
109W–108L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4
Clayton Kallenborn
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Jordan Barr
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.89
William Manning
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Katherine Haskins
100W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Tammy Hertel
150W–110L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Catherine DeSouza
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Mary Broden
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Susan Bayliss
161W–226L career · 9 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Laura Barnes
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.