Teams

Bad-Ace Women

2022 Montgomery Adult 55 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-29vs IT'S AH RAPP!Split 11
L#1 DoublesMary Barton-Dock / Kim Hazel vs Claris Brock / Ingrid Turner4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Chrisco Andrews / Elizabeth Taylor vs REGINA DAVIS / Tracy Walls6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2022-06-21vs Chen/CooperLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeborah Greenside / Julie Chrisco Andrews vs Sandy Snyder / Sandy Horowitz3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-18vs IT'S AH RAPP!Split 11
W#1 DoublesKim Hazel / Lisa Thomas vs Jackie Livesay / Donna Jones4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRegina Farrington / Elizabeth Pugh vs Telores Hill / Tracy Walls4-6, 4-6
2022-06-10vs Chen/CooperLost 01
L#1 DoublesChung Kim / Deborah Greenside vs Carol Gover / Katherine Dodson6-7, 2-3
2022-06-01vs Chen/CooperLost 01
L#3 DoublesRegina Farrington / Lisa Morelli vs Jennifer Garcia / Nancy Trimble2-6, 3-6
2022-05-24vs IT'S AH RAPP!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRegina Farrington / Jody Sklar vs Kim Chamberlain / Karlene Brathwaite6-7, 0-3
2022-05-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesRegina Farrington / Jody Sklar vs Jennifer Garcia / Nancy Cooper7-5, 6-6
2022-05-11vs IT'S AH RAPP!Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Hazel / Lisa Morelli vs Kim Chamberlain / Karlene Brathwaite4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRegina Farrington / Jody Sklar vs Claris Brock / Donna Jones6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChung Kim / Carolyn Greis vs Rebecca Sellassie / Telores Hill1-6, 5-7
2022-05-05vs Chen/CooperWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Greis / Chung Kim vs Reasmy Norin / Mazie Efinger5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Carolyn Greis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.62
Elizabeth Pugh
published 3.5
3.56
Deborah Greenside
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Jody Sklar
published
3.27
Regina Farrington
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Audrey Yen
published 3.5
Carrie Wofford
published 3.5
3.20
Mary Barton-Dock
published
2.98
Kim Hazel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Julie Chrisco Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Chung Kim
published 3
2.66
Dora Macia
published 3
Kate Fulton
published
Marjorie Goldman
published
Rosanne Johnston
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Farrington + Julie Chrisco Andrews213 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Greis + Kim Hazel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Greis
584W–372L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
3.5
Elizabeth Pugh
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
Deborah Greenside
139W–167L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.56
Jody Sklar
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Regina Farrington
179W–186L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Audrey Yen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Carrie Wofford
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Barton-Dock
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Kim Hazel
98W–117L career · 3 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Julie Chrisco Andrews
155W–97L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Chung Kim
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Dora Macia
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
Kate Fulton
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marjorie Goldman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rosanne Johnston
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.