Teams

BROOKSIDE CW6.5A

2023 COMBO · Women 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Haewon Kwon
published
3.34
Debby Heicklen
published 3.5
3.33
Bing Cai
published 3.5
3.28
Quynh Luu
published
3.27
Evelyn Barrett
published
3.06
Jennifer DeGraaff
published
2.98
Julie Johnson
published
2.86
Ai-Fen Shieu
published 3
2.82
Sandra Ballestrasse
published
2.73
Diana ODell
published 3
2.62
Pam Siu
published
2.56
Emma Prokter
published
2.45
Jenny Kelley
published
Laurie Karl
published
Shari Day
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Johnson + Sandra Ballestrasse213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Haewon Kwon
44W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Debby Heicklen
23W–25L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Bing Cai
20W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
Quynh Luu
12W–16L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Evelyn Barrett
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Jennifer DeGraaff
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.06
Julie Johnson
29W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Ai-Fen Shieu
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
Sandra Ballestrasse
16W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Diana ODell
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Pam Siu
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
Emma Prokter
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
Jenny Kelley
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%64%36%
2.45
Laurie Karl
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shari Day
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.