Teams

WI 2.5 Metro W Weddig- Juneau #2

2026 WI Adult 18 & Over Metro · 2.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 2.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-28vs WI 2.5 Metro W Watson - Juneau #1Won 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Stern / Lorna Dilley vs Milena Pirman / Mia Holmgren2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDeanna Weddig vs Kristy Merten6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDina Schachtely / Caron Wold vs Anna Watson / Anne-Marie Warren6-1, 6-4
2026-07-27vs WI 2.5 Metro W Watson - Juneau #1Won 10
W#1 DoublesDeanna Weddig / Lorna Dilley vs Anna Watson / Kristy Merten6-3, 7-5
2026-07-21vs WI 2.5 Metro W Watson - Juneau #1Split 11
W#1 DoublesDina Schachtely / Caron Wold vs Anne-Marie Warren / Milena Pirman6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKaren Stern vs Anna Watson4-6, 4-6
2026-06-26vs WI 2.5 Metro W Watson - Juneau #1Won 20
W#1 DoublesDeanna Weddig / Karen Stern vs Milena Pirman / Mia Holmgren7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDina Schachtely / Caron Wold vs Kristy Merten / Anne-Marie Warren4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-16vs WI 2.5 Metro W Watson - Juneau #1Split 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Stern / Caron Wold vs Anna Watson / Mia Holmgren3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDina Schachtely / Deanna Weddig vs Cynthia Reyes / Anne-Marie Warren6-2, 6-3
2026-06-09vs WI 2.5 Metro W Watson - Juneau #1Won 10
W#1 DoublesDeanna Weddig / Karen Stern vs Kristy Merten / Milena Pirman6-3, 6-3
2026-06-02vs WI 2.5 Metro W Watson - Juneau #1Won 30
W#1 DoublesCaron Wold / Lorna Dilley vs Anne-Marie Warren / Cynthia Reyes6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDeanna Weddig vs Anna Watson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Stern / Dina Schachtely vs Kristy Merten / Mia Holmgren7-5, 6-3
2026-05-26vs WI 2.5 Metro W Watson - Juneau #1Split 11
L#1 DoublesCaron Wold / Deanna Weddig vs Anna Watson / Mia Holmgren4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLorna Dilley / Karen Stern vs Anne-Marie Warren / Cynthia Reyes6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI 2.5 Metro W Weddig- Juneau #271121226226
2WI 2.5 Metro W Watson - Juneau #11781633245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.45
Karen Stern
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.38
Lorna Dilley
usually #2 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
2.33
Caron Wold
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 47% · published 2.5
2.29
Deanna Weddig
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Stern + Lorna Dilley314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Stern
11W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
Lorna Dilley
19W–11L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Caron Wold
42W–62L career · 15 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Deanna Weddig
18W–24L career · 13 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.