Teams

Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry

2022 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

16 players · average NTRP 4.05 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-15vs Sports Mall-Romney/AdamsonWon 21
L#1 Female DoublesShelli Johnston / Tiffany Olson vs Whitney Fautin / Jennifer Moreton5-7, 1-4
W#1 Female SinglesValerie Blackhurst vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 Female DoublesKimberlie Bayne / Pam Ollivier vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-12-08Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesSherilyn Rawlings / Kim Santiago vs Angie Haskins / Amy Allen6-2, 6-3
2022-12-01vs Sunpro-Daniels/WilsonWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesTyra Cook / Cambria Cook vs Debi Johnson / Tamara Miller6-1, 6-2
W#1 Female SinglesKim Santiago vs Kristi Parker6-1, 6-3
2022-11-17vs RISE AC-Glines/GlinesWon 21
W#1 Female DoublesTyra Cook / Brenda Fowler vs Rosemary Glines / Becky Thompson3-6, 5-2, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesTena Maughan / Sherilyn Rawlings vs Michele Halls / Nancy Skidmore5-7, 2-4
W#3 Female DoublesValerie Blackhurst / Jill Ford vs Nicole Garff / Mindy Thomas6-4, 6-3
2022-11-10vs Cottonwood Club-Warren/BriesacherSplit 11
W#2 Female DoublesTiffany Olson / Kim Santiago vs Adrienne Davis / Lori Briesacher3-6, 5-4, 1-0
L#3 Female DoublesKimberlie Bayne / Michelle McGill vs Lisa Hakes / Laura Williams2-6, 3-5
2022-11-03vs Sports Mall-Romney/AdamsonWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesShelli Johnston / Jill Ford vs Carolee Romney / Jennifer Moreton7-5, 5-4
W#2 Female DoublesTena Maughan / Brenda Fowler vs Terry Miya / Kyra Dunshee6-1, 6-0
W#3 Female DoublesHalli Craft / Tyra Cook vs Kimberly Holmstrom / Rachel Mills6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Johnson/Scharman5014615127
2Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry5116818156
3RISE AC-Glines/Glines4215922190
4Ivory Ridge-Monson/Black42131124177
5Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek32101021149
6Cottonwood Club-Warren/Briesacher33141024163
7Sunpro-Warren/Carter33141025196
8Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks24131127193
9Ivory Ridge-Brockbank/Allen2491532242
10Liberty Park Tennis-Young/Swensen2481634233
11Sports Mall-Romney/Adamson1561837226
12Sunpro-Daniels/Wilson1551939241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cambria Cook
published 4.5
3.87
Belinda Jensen
published 4
3.86
Tyra Cook
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Lisa Mayberry
published
3.74
Kim Santiago
usually #2 Female Doubles 33%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 4
3.72
Tiffany Olson
published
3.69
3.65
Jill Ford
published
3.62
Michelle McGill
published
3.60
Kimberlie Bayne
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Tena Maughan
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Brenda Fowler
published 4
3.53
Shelli Johnston
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Halli Craft
published 4
3.40
Valerie Blackhurst
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 50% · published 4
Pam Ollivier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherilyn Rawlings + Jill Ford6159% games+13.5% vs expected
Tiffany Olson + Brenda Fowler8356% games+10.2% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Lisa Mayberry3360% games+8.0% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Kim Santiago10855% games+6.0% vs expected
Halli Craft + Kim Santiago4158% games+4.8% vs expected
Lisa Mayberry + Tiffany Olson3357% games+4.6% vs expected
Shelli Johnston + Jill Ford4355% games+4.6% vs expected
Lisa Mayberry + Brenda Fowler3257% games+4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cambria Cook
32W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Belinda Jensen
150W–92L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Tyra Cook
43W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
Lisa Mayberry
80W–81L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Kim Santiago
151W–88L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Tiffany Olson
115W–51L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Sherilyn Rawlings
136W–64L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Jill Ford
86W–60L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Michelle McGill
56W–56L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.62
4
Kimberlie Bayne
95W–123L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Tena Maughan
87W–84L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Brenda Fowler
87W–76L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Shelli Johnston
113W–105L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Halli Craft
62W–48L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.41
4
Valerie Blackhurst
71W–54L career · 2 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.40
Pam Ollivier
67W–75L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.