Teams

MOValley/Margarita/55&Over6.0MXD

2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Combined

8 players · average NTRP 2.67 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-06vs Martini (chilling)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Miller / Brett Miller vs Diane Lewis / William Lynch7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Strohmeyer / Jim Strohmeyer vs Rebecca Hartfield / Trey Shaffer6-3, 6-3
2022-09-22vs Martini (chilling)Won 20
W#1 DoublesErin Kirwan / Paul Rapponotti vs Rebecca Hartfield / Trey Shaffer6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathy Strohmeyer / Jim Strohmeyer vs Angela Kammann / William Lynch6-4, 6-4
2022-09-15vs Martini (chilling)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Miller / Brett Miller vs Karen Agee / David Lang6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErin Kirwan / Nicholas Damato vs Diane Lewis / Trey Shaffer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-08vs Martini (chilling)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Rapponotti / Nicholas Damato vs Rebecca Hartfield / William Lynch6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Strohmeyer / Jim Strohmeyer vs Diane Lewis / Trey Shaffer0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Miller / Brett Miller vs Karen Agee / David Lang7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-01vs Martini (chilling)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Kirwan / Paul Rapponotti vs Cathy Chu / Nick Lammers6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Rapponotti / Nicholas Damato vs Diane Lewis / William Lynch2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKathy Strohmeyer / Jim Strohmeyer vs Karen Agee / David Lang6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MOValley/Margarita/55&Over6.0MXD3211413124
2Martini (chilling)2341123153

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Sam Shouldis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.19
Paul Rapponotti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Nicholas Damato
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Brett Miller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Jim Strohmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Cindy Rapponotti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Erin Kirwan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Julie Miller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Miller + Brett Miller13655% games+3.1% vs expected
Nicholas Damato + Cindy Rapponotti2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sam Shouldis
192W–126L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Paul Rapponotti
22W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.19
Nicholas Damato
55W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Brett Miller
75W–67L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
Jim Strohmeyer
66W–57L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
Cindy Rapponotti
29W–86L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Erin Kirwan
20W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Miller
30W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.