Teams

RRTC GREEN

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-12vs PCRK YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesCalvin Peterson / Alexander Peterson vs Adam Huff / Jonah Staller2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAustin Moore vs Ben Henry2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDevon Turnick / Thomas Chalk vs Craig Claxton / Jeffrey Hirschfeld6-2, 6-1
2026-08-05vs CR-DC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlexander Peterson / Calvin Peterson vs David Winkler / G F Tanham7-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAustin Moore vs Christopher Cucchiara3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDevon Turnick / Grant Warner vs Gary Wolberg / Jonathan Muslow6-2, 6-2
2026-07-29vs HRCA-S BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesCalvin Peterson / Alexander Peterson vs Rohit Dass / Brandon Neff2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAustin Moore vs Marshall Nichols4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGrant Warner / Devon Turnick vs Heyden Pue / Sadras Senthilvel6-1, 6-2
2026-07-22vs SS-LT ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesCalvin Peterson / Alexander Peterson vs Randy Schumaker / Shannon Stanley7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDevon Turnick vs Charles Phanumphai2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAustin Moore / Michael Sanders vs Reagan Harper / Paul Heffner2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Calvin Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Thomas Chalk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Alexander Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Austin Moore
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Grant Warner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Zack Palmer
published
3.52
Devon Turnick
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.49
Jonathan Jenkins
published
3.43
Michael Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexander Peterson + Calvin Peterson404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Calvin Peterson
9W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Thomas Chalk
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Alexander Peterson
4W–0L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Austin Moore
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Grant Warner
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
Zack Palmer
21W–12L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Devon Turnick
78W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
Jonathan Jenkins
7W–3L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Michael Sanders
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.