Teams

Hudson/Stuttgart

2026 Adult 40 & Over Spring 3 League · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-02vs Coleman/Bemis/MH/LR&FLost 13
L#1 DoublesAmy Johnson / Lisa Pierce vs Tera Moore / Marsha Partney4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Mulloy vs Leeann Hutson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesConnie Hudson / Melinda Hopson vs Margaret Byrd / Stephanie Hughes2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Hoskyn / Erin Oliver vs Sammie Smith / Sarah Blagg1-6, 1-6
2026-05-02vs Coleman/Bemis/MH/LR&FSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLisa Pierce / Amy Johnson vs Margaret Byrd / Sarah Blagg6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Mulloy vs Tera Moore6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesConnie Hudson / Melinda Hopson vs Stephanie Hughes / Sammie Smith6-3, 5-5
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Hoskyn / Erin Oliver vs Marsha Partney / Leeann Hutson2-6, 5-7
2026-04-18vs Coleman/Bemis/MH/LR&FLost 13
L#1 DoublesLisa Pierce / Amy Johnson vs Jillian Bemis / Jennifer Houghtaling2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Mulloy / Melinda Hopson vs Margaret Byrd / Cara Coleman4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesErin Oliver / Elizabeth Hoskyn vs Carolyn Kelley / Leeann Hutson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesGreta Lindsey / DeAnne Dickson vs Sammie Smith / Stephanie Hughes2-6, 3-6
2026-04-18vs Coleman/Bemis/MH/LR&FLost 12
L#2 DoublesDeAnne Dickson / Greta Lindsey vs Jillian Bemis / Cara Coleman0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Mulloy / Melinda Hopson vs Leeann Hutson / Sammie Smith6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesElizabeth Hoskyn / Erin Oliver vs Stephanie Hughes / Carolyn Kelley3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Coleman/Bemis/MH/LR&F4015511123
2Hudson/Stuttgart0451532217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Elizabeth Mulloy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Lisa Pierce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
DeAnne Dickson
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Melinda Hopson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.53
Elizabeth Hoskyn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.53
Erin Oliver
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
Greta Lindsey
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Hoskyn + Erin Oliver134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Elizabeth Mulloy
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
Lisa Pierce
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
DeAnne Dickson
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melinda Hopson
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Elizabeth Hoskyn
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Erin Oliver
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
2.5
Greta Lindsey
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.