Teams

Payne - RS Hard

2022 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs Bryan - RS ClayLost 01
L#3 DoublesLiz Payne / Megan Frederick vs Ann Scott / Cindy Jenista1-6, 3-6
2022-06-28vs Tan - SHLLost 01
L#2 DoublesElaine Hayward / Liz Payne vs Amelia Gandy / Maureen Proctor1-6, 2-6
2022-06-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLiz Payne / Bonnie Bucco vs Stacey Sloan / Katie Reeves1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-07vs Tan - SHLLost 01
L#1 DoublesLiz Payne / Sara Davy vs Cherie Krohn / Dodi Stringfellow0-6, 0-6
2022-05-24vs Bryan - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesDebbie Smith / Liz Payne vs Denise Wilson / Cindy Jenista1-6, 1-6
2022-05-17vs Tan - SHLLost 01
L#1 DoublesLiz Payne / Sara Davy vs Leah Taylor / Kris Pritchard1-6, 1-6
2022-05-10vs Andresen - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesLiz Payne / Sara Davy vs Tanya Hughes / Lisa Andresen1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Bonnie Bucco
published 3.5
Emma Graf
published 3.5
3.05
Sally Bergosh
published
2.92
Liz Payne
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.83
Tonya Chase
published
2.75
Kacee Bidnick
published
2.72
Courtney Fell
published 3
2.71
Elaine Hayward
published 3
2.66
Wendi Best
published
Jill Olinick
published
Marie Steen
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bonnie Bucco
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Emma Graf
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sally Bergosh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Liz Payne
139W–105L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Tonya Chase
10W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Kacee Bidnick
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.75
3
Courtney Fell
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Elaine Hayward
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Wendi Best
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.66
Jill Olinick
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marie Steen
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.