Teams

Je.Kaulback40A

2025 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-20vs Je.Wolborsky40A3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kaulback / Jessica Williams vs Jennifer Wolborsky / Jill Dykes6-3, 6-3
2025-05-06vs Ju.Shuey40AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kaulback / Jessica Williams vs Sharon Lambe / Lauren Hardwick6-3, 6-3
2025-04-29vs Li.Taylor40AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kaulback / Jessica Williams vs Lindsey Taylor / Taylor Cheek6-0, 6-1
2025-04-15vs Ki.Meeker40AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kaulback / Kristen Levine vs Holly Gyovai / Patricia Smith6-2, 6-2
2025-04-08vs Je.Wolborsky40A3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kaulback / Kristen Levine vs Paige Alford / Tina Parker6-1, 6-3
2025-03-25vs Ju.Shuey40AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kaulback / Kristen Levine vs Kelly Huffstetler / Sharon Lambe6-2, 6-2
2025-03-18vs Li.Taylor40AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kaulback / Jessica Williams vs Tina Santospago / Jennifer Bissette6-3, 6-3
2025-03-11vs An.Pershke40AWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Levine / Jennifer Kaulback vs Amy Cantando / Katherine Rostick6-4, 7-6
2025-03-04vs Ki.Meeker40AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Clark / Jennifer Kaulback vs Holly Gyovai / Kimberlie Meeker6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Kristen Levine
published
3.28
Samantha Pickett
published
3.25
Jennifer Kaulback
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.25
Elizabeth Rupert
published 3
2.99
Katie Warren
published
2.71
Rachel McLean
published
2.68
Lisa Dooley
published
2.63
Christine Rosin
published 3
2.48
Vaishali Ratia
published
2.46
Wendy Teeter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Warren + Elizabeth Rupert3255% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Kaulback + Samantha Pickett224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Levine
29W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Samantha Pickett
23W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Jennifer Kaulback
125W–76L career · 14 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Elizabeth Rupert
23W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.25
Katie Warren
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Rachel McLean
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
Lisa Dooley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Christine Rosin
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
2.63
Vaishali Ratia
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%57%43%
2.48
Wendy Teeter
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.