Teams

Lassow & Ted's Excellent Adventure

2025 ONE Doubles FALL · 3.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-10vs Tang: One Doubles Fall-tLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Godfrey / Robert MacHalek vs Christopher Bogen / Alexander Tang1-6, 3-6
2025-08-27vs Youngberg: JKLWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Lassow / Philip Green vs Luiz Pacheco / John Genz6-4, 6-3
2025-08-20vs Sumra: Volley LlamaLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert MacHalek / Thomas Godfrey vs Karan Sumra / Jeremy Ewers6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-08-13vs Reese/WomeldorfWon 10
W#1 DoublesPhilip Green / Thomas Godfrey vs Jason Reese / Andrew Womeldorf6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Philip Green
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Richard Lassow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Robert MacHalek
published
3.17
Thomas Godfrey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert MacHalek + Richard Lassow6849% games−3.9% vs expected
Thomas Godfrey + Richard Lassow134 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Godfrey + Robert MacHalek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Philip Green
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.64
Richard Lassow
25W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Robert MacHalek
14W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Thomas Godfrey
28W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.