Teams

TOC.Xiao

2026 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-03vs NMAC.McDonaldSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAshutosh Chaudhari / John Kim vs Jose Vargas / Hector Moreno6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesLuo Xiao vs Mark Aycock7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristopher Saba / Simon Gu vs Edward Aiken / Jason Gilbert6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Hofberg / Wayne Xiao vs Cameron Leggett / Elliot Orlowski4-6, 5-7
2026-04-19vs MCP.HariharanLost 13
L#1 DoublesJohn Kim / Austin Gardner vs Vijay Rajasekar / Mahesh Salian3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVasyl Kapitan vs Susanta Padhi4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChien-Ting Tang / Christopher Saba vs Bharath Dheekonda / Arvind Gupta5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLuo Xiao vs Pradeep Pudu6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-03-29vs TOC.ByrneWon 41
L#1 DoublesChien-Ting Tang / Zach Ward vs Nick Byrne / Thomas Newton4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesYunxiang Zhu vs Joe Park6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSimon Gu / Christopher Saba vs Ananth Chilakamarri / Henrique Perez6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAshutosh Chaudhari vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLuo Xiao / Ryan Givens vs Charlie Foster / Jagan Puttoju7-6, 6-3
2026-03-22vs VR.KochLost 23
W#1 DoublesChien-Ting Tang / Ashutosh Chaudhari vs Rohan de Silva / Dominic Piatek7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLuo Xiao vs Chris Welch6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSimon Gu / Hong Yu vs Robert Andersen / Matthew Newson1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesVasyl Kapitan vs Malla Reddy Anumandla6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid Hofberg / Christopher Saba vs Ralph Koch / Mike Smithson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-03-22vs NMAC.ByrdLost 13
L#1 DoublesSimon Gu / Chien-Ting Tang vs Deraymes Harris / Ken Glanville1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesVasyl Kapitan vs Nathan Rarangol1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLuo Xiao / Ashutosh Chaudhari vs Prasanna Chandramohan / Chaitawat Sirisereewan3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRyan Givens / Christopher Saba vs Zachary Hopp / Srivatsan Ramesh0-6, 1-6
2026-03-15vs TOC.LiLost 14
L#1 DoublesAshutosh Chaudhari / Chien-Ting Tang vs Rui Li / Leon LI3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesVasyl Kapitan vs Andrew Tse3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSimon Gu / Hong Yu vs David Shelton / Matthew Stewart3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesYunxiang Zhu vs Qi Zhang3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesWayne Xiao / David Hofberg vs Yuxu Yang / Tianren Zhou7-5, 7-5
2026-03-06vs TOC.DasaradhiSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSimon Gu / Chien-Ting Tang vs Arun Kumar / Vishal Gupta1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesVasyl Kapitan vs Santosh Voruganti6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAustin Gardner / Ashutosh Chaudhari vs Ranjith Dasaradhi / Praveen Akoju6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristopher Saba / David Hofberg vs Avinash Matam / Suriyanarayanan Varatharajan2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Luo Xiao
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 36% · published 3.5
3.30
Austin Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Yunxiang Zhu
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.27
Ashutosh Chaudhari
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Vasyl Kapitan
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.17
Simon Gu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Chien-Ting Tang
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.08
Christopher Saba
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
David Hofberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Ryan Givens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Wayne Xiao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Saba + David Hofberg033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Luo Xiao
85W–101L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Austin Gardner
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Yunxiang Zhu
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Ashutosh Chaudhari
61W–62L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Vasyl Kapitan
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Simon Gu
5W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Chien-Ting Tang
2W–7L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Christopher Saba
3W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
David Hofberg
34W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Ryan Givens
62W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Wayne Xiao
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.