Teams

Jo.Hastings18S

2024 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-17vs Pa.Vickers18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesWilliam Slocum vs Austin Council6-2, 6-0
2024-07-10Won 20
W#2 SinglesWilliam Slocum vs Nick Leverett6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesThomas Albertson vs Tony Mendoza6-1, 6-1
2024-06-26vs Jo.Williamson18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesThomas Albertson vs Todd Sprouse6-3, 6-2
2024-06-19vs Br.McLean18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesWilliam Slocum vs Mike Spinak7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Amir Lyall
published 3.5
3.22
William Slocum
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Josh Hastings
published
3.04
Thomas Albertson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.78
Cam Copley
published 3
Travis Salts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Slocum + Thomas Albertson3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amir Lyall
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
William Slocum
54W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Josh Hastings
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Thomas Albertson
49W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Cam Copley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Travis Salts
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.