Teams

Pelican Marsh - Prentice

2022 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-09vs Quail West - C. SeeseLost 01
L#2 DoublesRosie Renfro / Biqin Teng vs Tricia Blakeslee / Ginny Asgeirsson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-05-02vs Grey Hawk - J. HulbertLost 12
W#1 DoublesBiqin Teng / Fiona Prentice vs Janice Forner / Dina Viteretti6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Giannetti / Deborah Sawin vs Gina Taft / Donna Curry2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Taylor / Rosie Renfro vs Lisa Jess / Jill Hulbert2-6, 6-7
2022-04-25vs Pelican Bay North - ReedWon 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Spiwak / Biqin Teng vs Debi Reed / Rosemary Marinone6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-18vs Naples Reserve - HugginsWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeigh Traut / Rosie Renfro vs Patrice Clapacs / Tricia McBride7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Giannetti / Deborah Sawin vs Marianne Khayat / Kathy Shelgren6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-11vs Island Country Club - D. BurschWon 10
W#2 DoublesBiqin Teng / Rosie Renfro vs Missy Kuklenski / Renee Facciola6-4, 6-3
2022-04-04vs Esplanade- SteuererSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRosie Renfro / Deborah Sawin vs Joan Sanders / Sophia Modi4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBiqin Teng / Tonja Dahm vs Katherine MacWilliams / Lori Ricciuti6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-03-28vs Pelican Bay North - L. AllenLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Benson / Elizabeth Giannetti vs Peggy Strakosch / Patricia Miles1-6, 0-6
2022-03-21vs Marco YMCA - BallWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Taylor / Rosie Renfro vs Donna Digeronimo / Linda Keely7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Fiona Prentice
published 4
3.62
Biqin Teng
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.19
Elizabeth Giannetti
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Tonja Dahm
published
Kimberly Taylor
published
Linda Michaux
published
Nancy Spiwak
published
Rosie Renfro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Michaux + Biqin Teng5258% gamesnot enough data
Rosie Renfro + Biqin Teng224 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Giannetti + Rosie Renfro123 matchesnot enough data
Rosie Renfro + Kimberly Taylor213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Fiona Prentice
33W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Biqin Teng
68W–71L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Elizabeth Giannetti
29W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Tonja Dahm
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
Kimberly Taylor
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Michaux
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Spiwak
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rosie Renfro
36W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.