Teams

Grindstaff/Knoxville

2026 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League-Knoxville · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-13vs McKeehan/Hawkins/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesAudrey Stokely / Savannah Johnson vs Heather McKeehan / Cassidy Hawkins0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesChloe Junge vs Brooke Govert2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChelsea Grindstaff / Ketki Sheth vs Sarah Olesiuk / Georgia Rae Rainer0-6, 2-6
2025-12-07vs Attkisson/Rhody/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 SinglesAudrey Stokely vs Marcia Bates4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSavannah Johnson / Kristen Jones vs Maria Willard / Keri Brill2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMarilyn Cameron / Rebecca Villalba vs Sarah Attkisson / Brenda Rayfield1-6, 1-6
2025-12-06vs Yoder-Smith/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 SinglesChloe Junge vs Shawn Mason1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMarilyn Cameron / Audrey Stokely vs Hilary Brooks / Rachel Waddell3-6, 2-6
2025-11-16vs Roland/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesChloe Junge / Marilyn Cameron vs Elsa Roland / Rebecca Allen3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMary Reid Martens vs Katie Martin6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChelsea Grindstaff / Kristen Jones vs Paula Stand / Hannah Frame5-7, 1-6
2025-11-15vs Roland/KnoxvilleLost 12
W#1 SinglesChloe Junge vs Wyeshia Edwards1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChelsea Grindstaff / Marilyn Cameron vs Megan Witherington / Lora Boatman2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSavannah Johnson vs Cheri Arnsdorff3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-11-08vs McKeehan/Hawkins/KnoxvilleLost 04
L#1 SinglesChloe Junge vs Brooke Govert2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Villalba / Marilyn Cameron vs Geri Landry / Jennifer Cook1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesChelsea Grindstaff vs Annabel Sims1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSavannah Johnson / Audrey Stokely vs Sarah Olesiuk / Jen Rose2-6, 1-6
2025-11-01vs Yoder-Smith/KnoxvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesAudrey Stokely / Kristen Jones vs Shelly Krummen / Karen Koester1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMary Reid Martens vs Lynsey Anderson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Villalba / Chloe Junge vs Rachel Waddell / Karen Watson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChelsea Grindstaff / Savannah Johnson vs Shawn Mason / Lisa Smith2-6, 0-6
2025-10-25vs Attkisson/Rhody/KnoxvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesChelsea Grindstaff / Kristen Jones vs Martha Filipkowski / Maria Willard3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMary Reid Martens vs Sarah Attkisson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAudrey Stokely / Marilyn Cameron vs Brenda Rayfield / Jennifer Mendoza6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChloe Junge vs Angela Rae Rhody4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Villalba / Savannah Johnson vs Allison Oaks / Angela Gustin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Mary Reid Martens
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.50
Marilyn Cameron
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.45
Audrey Stokely
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.29
Ketki Sheth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.28
Chelsea Grindstaff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.25
Chloe Junge
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
2.08
Savannah Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marilyn Cameron + Audrey Stokely033 matchesnot enough data
Ketki Sheth + Savannah Johnson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Reid Martens
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
Marilyn Cameron
0W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
2.5
Audrey Stokely
3W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.45
Ketki Sheth
15W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
3
Chelsea Grindstaff
1W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.28
2.5
Chloe Junge
2W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
Savannah Johnson
10W–19L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.