← Teams

VTC-Darling

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.1 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Yanchen Qi
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
2.99
Maryann Velez
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.97
Christina Bergstrom
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.86
Teresa Darling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Alana Rhea
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results13 ties
2021-09-26Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesSteven Darling / Teresa Darling vs Cynthia Ross-Brockett / Ed de la Fuente6-4, 6-4
2021-09-26Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesSteven Darling / Teresa Darling vs Lesley Kerns / Bruce Herman6-3, 7-5
2021-09-25Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSteven Darling / Teresa Darling vs Sue Matyas / DAVID MATYAS7-5, 6-3
2021-07-17Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesChristina Bergstrom / Abhisar Gupta vs Renee LaFrance / Luis Magana6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAlana Rhea / Brad Johnson vs Wendy Laing / Don Hakala4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-16Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesChristina Bergstrom / Abhisar Gupta vs Amit Mahajan / Anita Marrero6-2, 6-2
2021-05-09Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesAlana Rhea / Allie Mauck vs Mary Sadlouskos / Jacqueline Babb Milligan6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesYanchen Qi vs Erin Canova7-5, 6-2
2021-05-01Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesTeresa Darling / Molly Wilson vs Brooke Daniel / Shelly Bigley6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesVirginia Martinez / Maryann Velez vs Patries Ferguson / Jacquelyn Miller6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlana Rhea / Trish Carder vs Emily Becker / Deanna Phillips6-4, 6-1
2021-04-18Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesTeresa Darling / Trish Carder vs Brooke Daniel / Shelly Bigley7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesYanchen Qi vs Emily Becker6-1, 6-2
2021-04-11Split 2–2
W#1 SinglesYanchen Qi vs Julie LaMontagne7-5, 1-1
L#2 DoublesTeresa Darling / Trish Carder vs Maya Mori / Christie Herkert7-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMaryann Velez vs Elizabeth Burns6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAlana Rhea / Virginia Martinez vs Nina Hanson / Christine Egan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-03-28Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesPatricia Nierenberg / Christina Bergstrom vs Evelyne Cassell / Nicole Norby6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesYanchen Qi vs Erin Canova7-6, 4-2
W#2 DoublesTeresa Darling / Molly Wilson vs Minhhang Tran / Shuping Li6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMaryann Velez vs Tina Kriebaum6-3, 7-5
2021-03-21Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesPatricia Nierenberg / Christina Bergstrom vs Christine Edwardsen / Ilona Vondolovski6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesYanchen Qi vs Tiffany Bowie6-4, 5-2
W#2 DoublesMolly Wilson / Teresa Darling vs Kathleen Finn / Cathryn Todd6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMaryann Velez / Virginia Martinez vs Andria Shirk / Jill Boyce7-5, 6-3
2021-03-07Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesAlana Rhea / Jean Pierre Belmar vs Christian Paulsen / Jane Paulsen6-3, 6-0
2021-03-06Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesChristina Bergstrom / Abhisar Gupta vs Shawn Boyce / KUSUM ASUDANI6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Yanchen Qi
29W–55L career
not enough data
—
3
Maryann Velez
81W–49L career
0%83%17%
2.99
3
Christina Bergstrom
67W–50L career
0%76%24%
2.97
3
Teresa Darling
122W–102L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Alana Rhea
78W–88L career
0%99%0%
2.77

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.