Teams

Whipp/Pham

2026 IA 18 & Over Adult Mixed League · 9.0 X 18 over

17 players · average NTRP 4.25 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-12vs IA/Smith-Madsen/18&Over9.0XWon 20
W#2 DoublesNathan Greiner / Anne Pham vs Matthew Morgan / Kristen Madsen6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRyan Staiert / Marina McCollom vs Jenn Smith / Jack Edwards6-4, 6-3
2025-11-23vs IA/Smith-Madsen/18&Over9.0XLost 12
W#1 DoublesAdam Rothert / Karen Barnes vs Michael Boyer / Libby Holder6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNathan Greiner / Amanda Hilton vs Lane Luhring / Brynn Reichardt6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTim Paulson / Trinh Le-Coulter vs Matthew Morgan / Lindsay Chase4-6, 5-7
2025-11-16vs IA/Smith-Madsen/18&Over9.0XLost 12
L#1 DoublesNathan Greiner / Greta Rath vs Rachel Morgan / Drew Mercier5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAdam Rothert / Hannah Wong vs Allison Davidson Motoyama / Renato Motoyama0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTrinh Le-Coulter / Tim Paulson vs Jeff Ditsworth / Molly Kremer7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-12vs IA/Smith-Madsen/18&Over9.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesPedro Gonzalez / Karen Barnes vs Kristen Madsen / Joel Heil1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesGreta Rath / Arthur Hermange vs Renato Motoyama / Allison Davidson Motoyama6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Rothert / Kelcey Brown vs Lindsay Chase / Jack Edwards4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-28vs IA/Smith-Madsen/18&Over9.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarina McCollom / Ryan Staiert vs Drew Mercier / Rachel Morgan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPedro Gonzalez / Eisha Nathwani vs Joel Heil / Katy Delagardelle1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNathan Greiner / Amanda Hilton vs Renato Motoyama / Allison Davidson Motoyama1-6, 2-6
2025-09-14vs IA/Smith-Madsen/18&Over9.0XWon 21
W#1 DoublesNathan Greiner / Jordyn Parry vs Lane Luhring / Kristen Madsen5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAdam Rothert / Greta Rath vs Joel Heil / Molly Kremer3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRyan Staiert / Marina McCollom vs Jenn Smith / Jeff Ditsworth6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0 X 18 over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Smith-Madsen/18&Over9.0X4212616157
2DiLeo/DiLeo2481021166
3Whipp/Pham2461226189

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Adam Rothert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.25
Arthur Hermange
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.09
Nathan Greiner
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.05
Ryan Staiert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
Marina McCollom
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Karen Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Kelcey Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Jordyn Parry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Calla Whipp
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Amanda Hilton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Hannah Wong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Anne Pham
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.17
Eisha Nathwani
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Trinh Le-Coulter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Greta Rath
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Pedro Gonzalez
published
Tim Paulson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marina McCollom + Ryan Staiert5166% games+5.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adam Rothert
88W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
5
Arthur Hermange
1W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.25
Nathan Greiner
14W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
4.09
4.5
Ryan Staiert
80W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
Marina McCollom
15W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.99
Karen Barnes
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Kelcey Brown
15W–28L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Jordyn Parry
168W–127L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Calla Whipp
44W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Amanda Hilton
58W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Hannah Wong
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Anne Pham
99W–28L career · 8 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Eisha Nathwani
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Trinh Le-Coulter
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
Greta Rath
68W–62L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Pedro Gonzalez
11W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tim Paulson
19W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.