Teams

BC-AltaVista/KarieLanterman

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-06-29vs BC-MCC/SarahSautotLost 01
L#3 DoublesKathy Inouye / Karie Lanterman vs Lauren Boros / Julia Tuverson1-6, 1-6
2025-06-15vs BC-SouthEnd/KathyKimLost 02
L#1 SinglesCleo Collier vs Suzette Ibanez3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKazumi Kono / Evangeline Roxas-Butlig vs Allyn Leoff / Hazel Evans3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-08vs BC-MiraCosta/ElizabethParkWon 10
W#3 DoublesKarie Lanterman / Michelle Lanterman vs Supriya Sunder Rajan / Nicky Quinn6-3, 6-3
2025-06-01vs BC-LLW-MiraCosta/KaleighMalloyLost 01
L#3 DoublesKarie Lanterman / Michelle Lanterman vs Katherine Ferguson / Julianna Pesce6-7, 3-6
2025-05-25vs BC-WestEnd/DebbieTranSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCeleste Torres / Maribeth F Rodriguez vs Huong Mary Lai / Theresa Riley2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Kong / Evangeline Roxas-Butlig vs Diane Pryzbylo / Barbara Hemmerich6-2, 6-3
2025-05-18vs BC-BillieJeanKing/BeejellSocoWon 10
W#1 SinglesCleo Collier vs Leslie Le6-2, 6-4
2025-05-04vs BC-Kramer/ColleenPost(fmBrandt)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJulie Misch / Maribeth F Rodriguez vs Jennifer Giordano / Kipp Batley1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKarie Lanterman / Michelle Lanterman vs Beth Moses / Danielle McConnell3-6, 4-6
2025-04-27vs BC-PVTC/TriciaRapaportLost 01
L#3 DoublesEvangeline Roxas-Butlig / Kazumi Kono vs Allison Weisnicht / Karly Bonfante2-6, 3-6
2025-04-19Won 10
W#2 SinglesCleo Collier vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-13vs BC-Peninsula/PatriciaGuerraYorkWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Misch / Evangeline Roxas-Butlig vs Philicia Endelman / Patricia Guerra York6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-06vs BC-MiraCosta/AnneDeMartiniWon 20
W#2 DoublesYoko Ishizuka / Evangeline Roxas-Butlig vs Aleta Boston / Maricel Rocha6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKarie Lanterman / Michelle Lanterman vs Irina Goedemans / Debra White3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Yoko Ishizuka
published
3.52
Celeste Torres
published 3.5
3.46
Sue Bingham
published
3.46
Hiroko Moribe
published 3.5
3.42
Debbie Carmody
published 3.5
3.36
Betty Torng
published 3.5
3.36
Kristen Roath
published
3.35
Michelle Lanterman
published
3.33
Annie Ho
published 3.5
3.33
Cleo Collier
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Gretchen Albarian
published 3.5
3.29
Belmarie Huynh
published 3.5
3.23
Rosemary Lee
published
3.21
Andrea Kong
published 3.5
3.20
Asako Fujii
published 3.5
3.17
Mina Yang
published
3.14
Tara Aviel
published
3.10
Kathy Inouye
published
3.06
Kazumi Kono
published
3.05
Evangeline Roxas-Butlig
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.95
Koko King
published
2.89
Maribeth F Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Karie Lanterman
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Carmody + Celeste Torres4456% games−0.8% vs expected
Maribeth F Rodriguez + Celeste Torres303 matchesnot enough data
Betty Torng + Celeste Torres303 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Carmody + Rosemary Lee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yoko Ishizuka
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Celeste Torres
46W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Sue Bingham
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Hiroko Moribe
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Debbie Carmody
18W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Betty Torng
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
Kristen Roath
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.36
Michelle Lanterman
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Annie Ho
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Cleo Collier
88W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Gretchen Albarian
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Belmarie Huynh
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Rosemary Lee
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Andrea Kong
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Asako Fujii
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Mina Yang
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.17
Tara Aviel
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.14
Kathy Inouye
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Kazumi Kono
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Evangeline Roxas-Butlig
49W–30L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.05
Koko King
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Maribeth F Rodriguez
164W–169L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Karie Lanterman
137W–186L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.