Teams

Nelson/Knoxville

2026 Adult 40 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-17vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesTracy Collins / Kristin Monge vs Rosa Luttrell / Jennifer Collins2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer McVeigh vs LOURDES BLANDINO4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Hollingsworth / Julie Harano vs Angie Goodwyn / Cindi Mooney6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShawn Mason / Lucianne Price vs Debi English / Allison Chandler6-2, 4-1
L#4 DoublesSuzanne Mubarak / Stacey Wright vs Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez / Paola Martinez7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-03vs Maccagli/KnoxvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesJennifer McVeigh / Tamy Wilson vs Deborah Szwarc / Helen Ericson6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCatalina Knutson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Hollingsworth / Julie Harano vs Sharie Gaby / Eileen Webster7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKimberly Nelson / Jeanne Blake vs Yoko Umezawa / Patsy Fischer6-3, 7-6
W#4 DoublesShawn Mason / Kate Watson vs Tugba Turnaoglu / Heather McKeehan6-2, 6-0
2026-04-19vs Martin/KnoxvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesTracy Collins / Shawn Mason vs Jennifer Lea / Tina Thompson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer McVeigh vs Lori DeRoos6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Nelson / Kristin Monge vs Amanda Martin / Ann Brady6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Mubarak / Jeanne Blake vs Dawn Coleman / Mary Hutchinson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#4 DoublesTamy Wilson / Stacey Wright vs Elsa Roland / Libby Hicks6-1, 6-3
2026-04-12vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesJulie Harano / Kelly Hollingsworth vs Pamela Shirley / Debi English4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer McVeigh vs Maja Lugonjic4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesShawn Mason / Kristin Monge vs Angie Goodwyn / Wendi Arnold6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Mubarak / Tamy Wilson vs Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez / Paola Martinez2-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesStacey Wright / Kate Watson vs Melanie Johnson / LOURDES BLANDINO3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-03-29vs Maccagli/KnoxvilleWon 40
W#1 SinglesShawn Mason vs Heather McKeehan6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Harano / Kelly Hollingsworth vs Karen Collins / Tugba Turnaoglu7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStacey Wright / Lucianne Price vs Ginger Arthur / Tara Osborne-Martz6-1, 6-1
W#4 DoublesKimberly Nelson / Kristin Monge vs Jen Rose / Linda Bui6-1, 6-2
2026-03-22vs Martin/KnoxvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesJulie Harano / Kelly Hollingsworth vs Cynthia Reed / Donna Walker6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCatalina Knutson vs Lori DeRoos4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Monge / Kimberly Nelson vs Amanda Smith / Susan Lahrs6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesShawn Mason / Kate Watson vs Mary Hutchinson / Dawn Coleman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#4 DoublesJennifer McVeigh / Lucianne Price vs Anna Taylor / Libby Hicks3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Catalina Knutson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Jeanne Blake
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.42
Jennifer McVeigh
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
3.34
Kristin Monge
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.29
Julie Harano
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Suzanne Mubarak
usually #4 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.26
Lucianne Price
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Kelly Hollingsworth
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.19
Shawn Mason
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.15
Lynsey Anderson
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Tamy Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Stacey Wright
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Blake + Suzanne Mubarak5169% games+4.3% vs expected
Julie Harano + Kelly Hollingsworth6160% gamesnot enough data
Tamy Wilson + Shawn Mason123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catalina Knutson
127W–129L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Jeanne Blake
14W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Jennifer McVeigh
11W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Kristin Monge
16W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
Julie Harano
24W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Suzanne Mubarak
17W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Lucianne Price
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Kelly Hollingsworth
18W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Shawn Mason
22W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
Lynsey Anderson
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
Tamy Wilson
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Stacey Wright
6W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.