Teams

Cartee 4.5 18 Thurs

2023 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 4.5 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-04vs Speight 4.5 18s Thur PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanel Green / Erin Huffines vs Tiffany Brown / Melissa Agner3-6, 1-6
2023-04-20vs Milam 4.5 18s ThursWon 10
W#1 DoublesMimi Cartee / Erin Huffines vs Saundra Westervelt / Kelly Lombardino2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-13vs Speight 4.5 18s Thur PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesJamie Galasso / Erin Huffines vs Beth Harris / Beth Mayer1-6, 1-6
2023-04-06vs Goodman 4.5 18 ThursWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmy Beth Kessinger vs Brittany Furr6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMimi Cartee / Erin Huffines vs Joy Martin / Dabney Porter6-2, 6-2
2023-03-23vs Speight 4.5 18s Thur PMLost 02
L#2 DoublesMimi Cartee / Erin Huffines vs Beth Harris / Beth Mayer0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Beth Kessinger vs Bety Miranda3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Dia Roberts
published 4.5
4.08
Linda Helms
published
4.05
Amy Beth Kessinger
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
3.90
Brenda Willis
published 4
3.84
Erin Huffines
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.84
Cari Powell
published 4
3.74
Kelly Gekas
published
3.72
Kara Ray
published
3.67
Mimi Cartee
published
3.67
Heidi Wrisley
published 4
3.64
Jamie Galasso
published 4
3.43
Carrie McElvogue
published 4
Janel Green
published
Joan Sloyan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dia Roberts + Linda Helms3253% gamesnot enough data
Kara Ray + Cari Powell314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dia Roberts
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.12
Linda Helms
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
Amy Beth Kessinger
82W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
4.05
4
Brenda Willis
31W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Erin Huffines
173W–130L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Cari Powell
34W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
Kelly Gekas
31W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Kara Ray
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
Mimi Cartee
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Heidi Wrisley
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Jamie Galasso
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Carrie McElvogue
4W–23L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Janel Green
18W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joan Sloyan
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.