Teams

Pace

2025 Mixed 18 & Over-SW · 3.5 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-16vs LumleySplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhillip Pace / Lori Williams vs Michael Waltman / Mary Lindsey Lumley5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStan Fisher / Meg Maulding vs Cory Lambert / Emily Lowery3-6, 4-6
2025-07-13vs LumleySplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhillip Pace / Meg Maulding vs Michael Waltman / Emily Lowery7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJeremy Self / Christine Waldrop vs Austin Carter / Taylor Murray1-6, 3-0
2025-07-10vs LumleySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeremy Self / Sheila Self vs Chad Leggett / Mary Lindsey Lumley3-6
W#2 DoublesStan Fisher / Christine Waldrop vs Austin Carter / Staci Anding7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-06-24vs LumleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeremy Self / Christine Waldrop vs Chad Leggett / Mary Lindsey Lumley7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAbram Diaz / Elizabeth Randall vs Michael Waltman / Emily Lowery3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-19vs LumleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesPhillip Pace / Lori Williams vs Michael Waltman / Staci Anding6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Patton / Christine Waldrop vs Chad Leggett / Mary Lindsey Lumley4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAbram Diaz / Elizabeth Randall vs Cory Lambert / Taylor Murray6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Meg Maulding
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Stan Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Christine Waldrop
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
John Patton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Jeremy Self
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Abram Diaz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Phillip Pace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sheila Self
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Waldrop + Phillip Pace314 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Self + Jeremy Self224 matchesnot enough data
Meg Maulding + Stan Fisher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meg Maulding
23W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Stan Fisher
32W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
3.5
Christine Waldrop
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
John Patton
47W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Jeremy Self
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Abram Diaz
29W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Phillip Pace
40W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Sheila Self
14W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.