Teams

DP-Smith

2025 · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 55 & Over (Women) - Fall

11 players · average NTRP / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-14vs SGC-LairdSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNancy Bondurant / Melanie Young vs Tish Elizalde / Danielle Sussman1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDorothy Lee / Joni Dibrell vs Polly Duck / Melissa Olszewski7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2025-11-08vs Landings-Kane/BryantWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoni Dibrell / Douglass Smith vs Joan Fitzgibbon / Fonda Salgueiro6-2, 6-2
2025-10-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJanet Whitley / Sandra Davis vs Tracy Copenhaver / Julie Phillips5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-10-03vs SGC-LairdLost 12
W#1 DoublesSandra Davis / Janet Whitley vs Dede Laird / Beth Benson6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDouglass Smith / Diane Freeman vs Tish Elizalde / Terri Fruit4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLois Cowart / Linda Wilkinson vs Phyllis Curlee / Catharine Thomas6-7, 6-7
2025-09-26vs Landings-Kane/BryantLost 01
L#1 DoublesLois Cowart / Linda Wilkinson vs Jill Brooks / Joni Brownstein0-6, 1-6
2025-09-12vs SATA/Michelle MonahanLost 02
L#1 DoublesLois Cowart / Martha Mathews vs Deanna Childers / Terry Sargent2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Wilkinson / Melanie Young vs Jennifer Smith / Mary Ann Borysowicz0-6, 0-6
2025-09-05Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMelanie Young / Linda Wilkinson vs Tracy Copenhaver / Julie Phillips0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDorothy Lee / Nancy Bondurant vs Sharon Zellerer / Christie Risch6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLois Cowart / Kim Grimmett vs Kathy Campbell / Emily Jowers6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 55 & Over (Women) - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DP-Staudt53131128221
2SGC-Laird35111326223
3Landings-Kane/Bryant35111329204
4DP-Smith2661838265

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Joni Dibrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Dorothy Lee
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.67
Janet Whitley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Douglass Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Lois Cowart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Pamela Leed
published
3.29
Kim Grimmett
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.29
Leigh Egart
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.25
Martha Mathews
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.94
Linda Wilkinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Nancy Bondurant
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lois Cowart + Linda Wilkinson134 matchesnot enough data
Dorothy Lee + Kim Grimmett044 matchesnot enough data
Douglass Smith + Joni Dibrell123 matchesnot enough data
Martha Mathews + Pamela Leed123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joni Dibrell
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
Dorothy Lee
17W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Janet Whitley
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Douglass Smith
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Lois Cowart
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Pamela Leed
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Kim Grimmett
8W–24L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Leigh Egart
5W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Martha Mathews
10W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Linda Wilkinson
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
Nancy Bondurant
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.