Teams

KSutton

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-11vs JKellyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJonetta Bonds / Olga Tiselsky vs Laura Capps / Ashlie Adams0-6, 2-6
2022-05-04vs LFitzgeraldWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristine Bass / Michele Peters vs Suzanne Ruggles / Neepa Patel6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-14vs LFitzgeraldWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristine Bass / Susan Haughney vs Diane Williams / Theresa Rosario-Jansen6-0, 6-2
2022-04-06vs CMillerLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Bass / Kelly Sutton vs Mary Hellner / Miho Ogura3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-30vs JKellyWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristine Bass vs Rachel Pisciotta6-1, 6-2
2022-03-28vs SGroseSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNancy Haire / Olga Tiselsky vs Amy Lindsey / Sandhya Gopal7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Bass / Kelleigh Russo vs Rita Lawson / Jessica Brock0-6, 3-6
2022-03-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Bass / Susan Wilkerson vs Annmarie Curle / Jennifer Edmundson4-6, 2-6
2022-03-02vs CMillerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKelleigh Russo / Olga Tiselsky vs Kelly Johnson / Anne Boney7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Bass / Susan Haughney vs Caroline Miller / Sandy Willey6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Nancy Haire
published
3.19
Michele Fitzsimons
published
3.19
Olga Tiselsky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Christine Bass
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.11
Susan Haughney
published
3.09
Kelly Sutton
published
3.07
Susan Wilkerson
published
3.05
Kelleigh Russo
published
2.93
Michele Peters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Wilkerson + Kelleigh Russo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Haire
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Michele Fitzsimons
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Olga Tiselsky
129W–135L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Christine Bass
78W–73L career · 7 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Susan Haughney
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kelly Sutton
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
Susan Wilkerson
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
Kelleigh Russo
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Michele Peters
23W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.