Teams

C 6.5W BA Pavlish

2024 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 6.5 Combo Women

23 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-24vs C 6.5W WR1 RobertsLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindsay Verdova / Jennifer Leombruno vs Brittney Kohanski / Tricia Niswander4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Elliott / Hannah Oakes vs Kathleen Daberko / Hilary Thomas5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCourtney Gile / Shanna Edge vs Patricia Nelson / Beth Greenwood7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-11-15vs C 6.5W MV1 AndersonWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarla Silverstein / Pam Nelson vs Cheryl Kanetsky / Patti Baucco6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeather Pollack / Kathy Kramer vs Heather Ahearn / Meghan Walsh6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Hughes / Sandy Gilbert vs Holly Vilsack / Meghan Sabitsch6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-08vs C 6.5W WE AllanWon 20
W#2 DoublesLaura Streit / Jillian Wollet vs Lindsay Lodge / Leigh Strawser6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Brubaker / Yolanda Hohman vs Kasie Burgess / Roxane Durant6-4, 6-2
2024-11-01vs C 6.5W CV2 FergusonWon 20
W#2 DoublesSandy Gilbert / Wendy Hart vs Cecelia Hamilton / Laura Simmons7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesYolanda Hohman / Courtney Gile vs Ivana Urbanowski / Carol Oglesbee6-3, 6-3
2024-10-18vs C 6.5W WR1 RobertsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Brubaker / Kathy Kramer vs Kelle DeBoth / Carol Soos5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnne Cost / Bridget Pavlish vs Brittney Kohanski / Katherine Bennett6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJillian Wollet / Laura Hughes vs Patricia Nelson / Teri Mollison6-1, 6-3
2024-10-13vs C 6.5W MV1 AndersonLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarla Silverstein / Anne Cost vs Kristin Chuko / Christine Olenik7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesHeather Pollack / Shanna Edge vs Libby Freeman / Susan Gorjup6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Siddiq / Sandy Gilbert vs Xiaojuan Li / Elisa Meadows3-6, 4-6
2024-10-06vs C 6.5W WE AllanLost 12
W#1 DoublesLindsay Verdova / Jennifer Leombruno vs Jillian Fetzner / Kasie Burgess6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBridget Pavlish / Shanna Edge vs Ellen Martin / Susan Wiley3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Hughes / Jillian Wollet vs Shannan Holodinski / Erin Riddle6-7, 5-7
2024-09-29vs C 6.5W CV2 FergusonWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Streit / Kathy Kramer vs Kathy Mallak / Monica Lozano6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarla Silverstein / Pam Nelson vs Katy Donohue / Janice Kovalcheck6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesWendy Hart / Hannah Oakes vs Laura Simmons / Debora Bork6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings25 teams · NEOTA 6.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 6.5W NC1 Preston9126413196
2C 6.5W CC Freund7119514155
3C 6.5W MM Frazier7118615145
4C 6.5W WE Allan71141027237
5C 6.5W CRC Garten7219818191
6C 6.5W GR Ross73181232276
7C 6.5W AO Pecko6218617177
8C 6.5W MV2 Kirchick63171025222
9C 6.5W BA Pavlish5316822205
10C 6.5W PM Lengel53141024207
11C 6.5W CV1 Derbyshire54161125234
12C 6.5W TP1 Consilio55151534283
13C 6.5W PW1 Hensley4415923203
14C 6.5W MV1 Anderson44121226217
15C 6.5W TP2 Voth44111331234
16C 6.5W AS Thomas46121839295
17C 6.5W CV2 Ferguson35111329245
18C 6.5W BR Sweeney37121841288
19C 6.5W LT Banas2691532243
20C 6.5W AVB Pallante2671736242
21C 6.5W PW2 Lawrence2651939258
22C 6.5W NC2 Trent2872348313
23C 6.5W WR1 Roberts1771738258
24C 6.5W NR Standish1742040241
25C 6.5W WR2 Treblas0922550310

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Laura Streit
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Lindsay Verdova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Marla Silverstein
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Amy Elliott
published 3.5
Courtney Gile
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Heather Pollack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Julie Brubaker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Jillian Wollet
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Bridget Pavlish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Pam Roche
published
2.93
Laura Siddiq
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Jennifer Leombruno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Hannah Oakes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Karen Trecarichi
published
2.67
Anne Cost
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Yolanda Hohman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Shanna Edge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kathy Kramer
published
Laura Hughes
published
Monica Dublo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Pam Nelson
published
Sandy Gilbert
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Wendy Hart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marla Silverstein + Lindsay Verdova5071% games+15.0% vs expected
Marla Silverstein + Courtney Gile8158% games+14.2% vs expected
Julie Brubaker + Yolanda Hohman8060% games+12.9% vs expected
Heather Pollack + Laura Streit6162% games+9.4% vs expected
Bridget Pavlish + Marla Silverstein281254% games+5.9% vs expected
Wendy Hart + Marla Silverstein11259% games+4.6% vs expected
Laura Hughes + Marla Silverstein5654% games+1.3% vs expected
Sandy Gilbert + Laura Siddiq4449% games−1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Streit
47W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Lindsay Verdova
46W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Marla Silverstein
93W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Amy Elliott
24W–18L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Courtney Gile
34W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Heather Pollack
50W–60L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.16
Julie Brubaker
104W–107L career · 2 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jillian Wollet
30W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01
3.5
Bridget Pavlish
72W–62L career · 2 lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.97
Pam Roche
9W–17L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.94
Laura Siddiq
32W–59L career · 1 line in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.93
Jennifer Leombruno
54W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.93
Hannah Oakes
22W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
2.78
Karen Trecarichi
25W–56L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
2.75
3
Anne Cost
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Yolanda Hohman
47W–76L career · 2 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.64
Shanna Edge
4W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
2.37
Kathy Kramer
32W–34L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Hughes
27W–34L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Dublo
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Pam Nelson
28W–47L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandy Gilbert
34W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Wendy Hart
29W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.