Teams

WI Tri Delta M Fall Sngls MALT Day

2023 WI Other · WI Tri Level Delta Fall Singles Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.25 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · WI Tri Level Delta Fall Singles Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Tri Delta M Fall Sngls MALT Isensee10228822237
2WI Tri Delta M Fall Sngls MALT Nicholas84221428262
3WI Tri Delta M Fall Sngls MALT Dorfman75211533302
4WI Tri Delta M Fall Sngls MALT Martinez75191738297
5WI Tri Delta M Fall Sngls MALT Day57162043319
6WI Tri Delta M Fall Sngls MALT Jones39122448325
7WI Tri Delta M Fall Sngls MALT Sager21072958358

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Bradley Day
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #3 Singles 30% · published 3.5
Ben Hauch
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Robbie Spiegler
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bradley Day
64W–75L career · 33 lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.09
3
Ben Hauch
5W–24L career · 24 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robbie Spiegler
39W–71L career · 30 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.