Teams

SWW-GTC-Gonzalez

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

21 players · average NTRP 3.06 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-15vs KTAC-Lopes 3.0MWon 50
W#1 DoublesMatt Newton / Anthony Jackson vs Noel Panilagao / Cedric Bella6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJeff Boyden vs Jumaane Cabrera6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPeter Mccarville / Devon Newsom vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesPaul Detering vs Nathan Salscheider6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesScott Baird / Tito Monge vs Joel Conger / Carl Paulino7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-05-31vs STAC-Wallace 3.0MWon 50
W#1 DoublesNathan Rettke / Matt Newton vs Michael Harn / Matt Purcell6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesVin Baylon vs Michal Pannkuk6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Detering / George Gonzalez vs Anderson Durham / James Maxfields6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNicholas Toglia vs David Williams6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPeter Mccarville / Adam Bien vs James Phillips / Daniel Berner6-2, 7-5
2025-05-25vs KTAC-Lopes 3.0MWon 32
W#1 DoublesAnthony Jackson / Michael Riggin vs Joel Conger / John Rapp6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJeff Boyden vs Roderick Camarce4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Ta / Tim Nguyen vs Kevin Mense / Cedric Bella1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesWilliam Collins vs Jumaane Cabrera6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGavin Cochran / Devon Newsom vs Keinan Paulino / Craig Fulkerson6-4, 6-3
2025-05-17vs SWW-JTC-KasaLost 14
W#1 DoublesMatt Newton / Paul Detering vs Steve Stetter / Dallas Sloan6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNicholas Toglia vs Larry Nguyen3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTito Monge / JOHN COSTANTI vs Lupe Gonzales / Adam Pauley2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAdam Bien vs Peyton Monson6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesScott Baird / Will Pelleteri vs Bryson Huie / Todd Fauchald5-7, 3-6
2025-05-03vs TLTC-NemetzWon 32
W#1 DoublesAnthony Jackson / George Gonzalez vs Jeremiah Murlless / David Nemetz6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVin Baylon vs Chad Adams6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGavin Cochran / Michael Riggin vs Brian Wald / Shane Crook6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesWilliam Collins vs James Matteucci6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrew Ta / Tim Nguyen vs Larry Gezelius / Jacob Strobl3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-27vs STAC-Wallace 3.0MWon 41
W#1 DoublesMatt Newton / George Gonzalez vs David Earl / James Maxfields6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesVin Baylon vs David Williams6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNathan Rettke / Peter Mccarville vs Preston Wallace / James Phillips2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJeff Boyden vs Matt Purcell6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Riggin / Adam Bien vs Daniel Berner / Patrick ONeill6-2, 6-1
2025-04-13vs TLTC-NemetzWon 32
W#1 DoublesNathan Rettke / Jeff Boyden vs Kevin Desmond / Paul Treleven6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesPaul Detering vs Chad Adams5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGavin Cochran / Devon Newsom vs Jeremiah Murlless / David Nemetz3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAdam Bien vs Chris Blaesi6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJOHN COSTANTI / Joseph Rehberger vs Brody Kunz / Trevor Pousson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-05vs SWW-JTC-KasaWon 41
W#1 DoublesPaul Detering / George Gonzalez vs Scott Lane / Steve Stetter6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJeff Boyden vs Ben Sorochuk6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWilliam Collins / Andrew Ta vs Jeremy Kasa / Scott Monson2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesNicholas Toglia vs Michael Osthus6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPeter Mccarville / Anthony Jackson vs Lupe Gonzales / Kent Gavin7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Michael Riggin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Anthony Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.16
Jeff Boyden
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.14
Matt Newton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Vin Baylon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.08
Adam Bien
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.00
Nicholas Toglia
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.95
Gavin Cochran
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Joseph Rehberger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Paul Detering
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.91
Tim Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Peter Mccarville
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Nathan Rettke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.76
George Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
William Collins
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Scott Baird
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
JOHN COSTANTI
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Andrew Ta
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Devon Newsom
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Tito Monge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Will Pelleteri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anthony Jackson + Will Pelleteri5060% games+10.6% vs expected
Nathan Rettke + George Gonzalez6755% games+5.3% vs expected
Anthony Jackson + Gavin Cochran7256% games+5.1% vs expected
Nathan Rettke + Anthony Jackson6159% games+4.3% vs expected
Tito Monge + Devon Newsom1445% games+2.3% vs expected
Matt Newton + George Gonzalez5258% games+1.9% vs expected
George Gonzalez + Anthony Jackson5455% games+1.4% vs expected
Scott Baird + JOHN COSTANTI5946% games+0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michael Riggin
47W–25L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3
Anthony Jackson
65W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Jeff Boyden
25W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Matt Newton
30W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Vin Baylon
43W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
3
Adam Bien
68W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Nicholas Toglia
23W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Gavin Cochran
41W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Joseph Rehberger
24W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Paul Detering
17W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
2.92
3
Tim Nguyen
11W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Peter Mccarville
20W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Nathan Rettke
104W–113L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
3
George Gonzalez
92W–109L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
3
William Collins
105W–110L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Scott Baird
70W–127L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
JOHN COSTANTI
34W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Andrew Ta
17W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Devon Newsom
6W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Tito Monge
8W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Will Pelleteri
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.