Teams

Smouni/LR/PVCC

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Adkins / Christine Castillo vs Holly Johnson / Joshua Gaines6-1, 7-5
2025-01-28vs Ritchie/LR/CCLRLost 01
L#3 SinglesHatim Smouni vs Jonathan Parkey5-7, 2-6
2024-11-25vs Aguilar/Team ATA/RebLost 12
L#1 SinglesLevent Ozdemir vs Matt Donaghy4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDustin Green vs Ali Yavuzer7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesHatim Smouni vs Grant Morshedi3-6, 2-6
2024-11-19vs Szeto/LR/RebSplit 11
W#2 SinglesWilliam Kalkbrenner vs Roger Weldon6-3, 7-6
L#3 SinglesHatim Smouni vs Tay Sisoukrath3-6, 0-6
2024-11-17vs Dobry/Maumelle/BPWon 21
W#1 SinglesLevent Ozdemir vs Anel Junior Ossius6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesBrian Wayne vs John Lee3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesHatim Smouni vs Jarred Kibbey7-6, 6-2
2024-11-11vs Nelsen/LR/BPLost 01
L#3 SinglesAndrew Adkins vs Zachary Webster2-6, 5-7
2024-11-07vs Abston/LR/RebLost 01
L#3 SinglesAndrew Adkins vs Jeremy Partin1-6, 5-7
2024-11-07vs Overley/CollinsLost 12
L#1 SinglesDustin Green vs William Pollock3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesBrian Wayne vs Sam Overley6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesJohn Harbour vs Dan Parfitt6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-29vs Massey/Burns/LRLost 12
W#1 SinglesAndrew Adkins vs Sean Massey4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBrian Wayne vs Don Dobbins2-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesHatim Smouni vs Carter Morris0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
William Kalkbrenner
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.99
Andrew Adkins
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Hatim Smouni
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.80
Levent Ozdemir
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.73
Brian Wayne
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Dustin Green
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
John Harbour
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Michael Berkshire
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Wayne + Andrew Adkins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Kalkbrenner
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Andrew Adkins
35W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
Hatim Smouni
14W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Levent Ozdemir
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Brian Wayne
6W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Dustin Green
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Harbour
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Michael Berkshire
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.