Teams

KY/LOU/VOSS/OCONNELL(NPC)

2022 USTA COMBO 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.88 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Jennifer Goselin
published
3.98
Justina Powers
published 4
3.95
Tonja Brewer
published 4
3.80
Kathleen Berghausen
published
3.80
El Shelton
published 4
3.72
Brenda Stofer
published 4
3.72
Kristin Shapira
published
3.68
Kelli Gordinier
published 4
3.57
Cammie O'Connell
published 4
3.56
Stacy Freibert
published
3.55
Marcia Littlefield
published
3.40
Shelby Russell
published
3.38
Ciara Warren
published 3.5
3.33
Vongmany Edmonds
published
3.30
Dana Collins
published 3.5
3.27
Tamara McCormick
published
3.20
Kristina Jordan
published
3.00
Wendi Haller
published
Lisa Domene
published
Rona Martins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelli Gordinier + Cammie O'Connell5157% games+1.9% vs expected
Tamara McCormick + Vongmany Edmonds6354% games−0.1% vs expected
Justina Powers + Kristin Shapira6167% games−1.0% vs expected
Tamara McCormick + Ciara Warren134 matchesnot enough data
Justina Powers + Cammie O'Connell213 matchesnot enough data
Vongmany Edmonds + Jennifer Goselin213 matchesnot enough data
Vongmany Edmonds + Ciara Warren123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Goselin
69W–33L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Justina Powers
90W–66L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Tonja Brewer
90W–62L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.95
Kathleen Berghausen
39W–31L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
El Shelton
28W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Brenda Stofer
84W–64L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Kristin Shapira
43W–21L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Kelli Gordinier
66W–55L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Cammie O'Connell
69W–36L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Stacy Freibert
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Marcia Littlefield
36W–48L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
Shelby Russell
61W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Ciara Warren
48W–40L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Vongmany Edmonds
69W–56L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Dana Collins
17W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Tamara McCormick
55W–39L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Kristina Jordan
50W–38L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Wendi Haller
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.00
Lisa Domene
23W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rona Martins
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.