Teams

TCU SCHNEIDER

2026 FW Summer Ladies 18 & Over Social Doubles League · Friday morning 3.0 ladies

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-31vs RTC DURBORAWWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnnette Thompson / Stacy Chillscyzn vs Christine Hooper / Cindy Aldrete6-3, 6-4
2026-07-24vs LTF LEIKERWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacy Chillscyzn / Allison Khan vs Molly Leiker / Maggie Taylor6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2026-07-10vs RID ARMSTRONG/HARRWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacy Chillscyzn / Miriah Schneider vs Kat Scheurer / Rachel Payne6-0, 6-1
2026-07-03vs WAG ALEXANDERLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacy Chillscyzn / Crystal Thomas vs Casey Colvin / Carrie McDaniel7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-26vs DCC LOPEZWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacy Chillscyzn / Allison Khan vs Kristin Stork / Jessica Hughes4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-24vs RC DAVENPORTWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Khan / Ambree Smith vs Courtney Schmuck / Lucy Kelly6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-12vs RTC DURBORAWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStacy Chillscyzn / Annette Thompson vs JULIE PARKE / TRACY MCCASKEY6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmbree Smith / Susan Cole vs Joy Blaha / Beth Haugh5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-05vs LTF LEIKERWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacy Chillscyzn / Annette Thompson vs Molly Leiker / Ashley Herndon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-29vs OAK DAEMLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmbree Smith / Miriah Schneider vs Adrianne Daem / Andrea Landes1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday morning 3.0 ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Stacy Chillscyzn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Carolyn Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Allison Khan
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.79
Hilaire Baumgartner
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
2.77
Crystal Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.50
Miriah Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
2.32
Ambree Smith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Crystal Thomas + Allison Khan15461% games+7.9% vs expected
Crystal Thomas + Miriah Schneider033 matchesnot enough data
Allison Khan + Miriah Schneider303 matchesnot enough data
Allison Khan + Ambree Smith303 matchesnot enough data
Miriah Schneider + Ambree Smith033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacy Chillscyzn
10W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Carolyn Rogers
25W–17L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Allison Khan
36W–11L career · 13 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Hilaire Baumgartner
23W–10L career · 11 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Crystal Thomas
22W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Miriah Schneider
23W–34L career · 13 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
2.5
Ambree Smith
18W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.