Teams

NITA E 30W18h Vaughan-Merriman

2026 NITA1 ESL Adult 18 & Over · NITA ESL 18 & Over 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesLori Drumtra / Donna Sotern vs Cathy Gilmartin / Deirdre Sebastian4-6, 1-4
L#1 SinglesBetsy Colombe vs Paula Skinner0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesShannon Enorense / Kelsey Miller vs Alexandra Didac / Anne Rago Hackett6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKristi Kusak / Patricia Merriman vs Traci Burnham / Tracey Hagelin7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-09vs NITA E 30W18c Challenge-RossiLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Drumtra / Donna Sotern vs Sylvie Rossi / Ashley Burk1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBetsy Colombe / Angela J Randall vs Ally Bachmann / Kathleen Worley0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Owens / Amy Heimerdinger vs Lynn Kaczmarz / Sharon Hahn6-2, 7-5
L#1 DoublesShannon Enorense / Rosie McNamee vs JennI Stull / Debbie Weisz2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMonica Bykowski vs Noel Talluto1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Heimerdinger / Anne Sweeney vs Julie Leischner / Katie Knaus2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAngela J Randall / Kelsey Miller vs Robin Stoller / Sharon Jerndt3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Sweeney / Rosie McNamee vs Julie Gervais / Vrinda Kumar1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatie Owens / Betsy Colombe vs Amelia Dantzer / Julene Freund6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-10-05vs NITA E 30W18a Five Star-SchwandtLost 04
L#1 DoublesDonna Sotern / Lori Drumtra vs Bethany Young / Char Sparacio2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMonica Bykowski vs Lauren Cangilla2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Baxter / Rosie McNamee vs Liz Schwandt / Denise McKenna2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPatricia Merriman / Amy Heimerdinger vs Anuradha Ram / Manasa Bandapalle1-6, 4-6
2025-09-07vs NITA E 30W18e Naperville-BianchiLost 04
L#1 DoublesAngela J Randall / Kelsey Miller vs Katherine Bianchi / Kara Bittner6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMonica Bykowski vs Loyola Pasiewicz0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShannon Enorense / Betsy Colombe vs Michelle Fonash / Tina Miller2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKristi Kusak / Katie Owens vs Elizabeth Mathieson / Betty Mikula2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · NITA ESL 18 & Over 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA E 30W18f Courts Plus-Michalak/Klosterman6021311132
2NITA E 30W18b Courts Plus-Hackett/Gilmartin4215921169
3NITA E 30W18a Five Star-Schwandt3213715137
4NITA E 30W18c Challenge-Rossi3291124174
5NITA E 30W18e Naperville-Bianchi33141025197
6NITA E 30W18h Vaughan-Merriman1551940257
7NITA E 30W18g WITHDREW Five Star-Fallon/Klepper000000
8NITA E 30W18d Rush Copley-Mastin/Jerndt0632145258

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Lori Drumtra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Donna Sotern
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Anne Sweeney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Betsy Colombe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Angela J Randall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Amy Heimerdinger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Shannon Enorense
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Rosie McNamee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Patricia Merriman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Monica Bykowski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.40
Kristi Kusak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Katie Owens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela J Randall + Rosie McNamee1445% games+2.2% vs expected
Patricia Merriman + Kristi Kusak2537% games+0.3% vs expected
Patricia Merriman + Amy Heimerdinger1430% games−9.3% vs expected
Donna Sotern + Lori Drumtra5946% games−13.8% vs expected
Patricia Merriman + Katie Owens1537% gamesnot enough data
Monica Bykowski + Amy Heimerdinger1436% gamesnot enough data
Kristi Kusak + Shannon Enorense1436% gamesnot enough data
Shannon Enorense + Betsy Colombe4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Drumtra
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Donna Sotern
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Anne Sweeney
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Betsy Colombe
12W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Angela J Randall
14W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Amy Heimerdinger
8W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Shannon Enorense
14W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Rosie McNamee
7W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
Patricia Merriman
10W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Monica Bykowski
8W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.42
Kristi Kusak
4W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40
Katie Owens
8W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.