Teams

Ace Ace In Your Face

2025 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-16vs KRC Summer CampWon 10
W#1 DoublesReina Visaya / Aureana Wong vs Jane Schumacker / Janalle Kaloi-chen5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-09vs Triple the FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesHaley Fujimori / Caasi Nakasone vs Nikki Morimoto / Shaina Yeung6-4, 6-1
2025-08-02vs SLammersWon 10
W#1 DoublesHaley Fujimori / Caasi Nakasone vs Raimi Okazaki / Sheila Kurosu6-2, 6-2
2025-07-26vs Deuces WilderWon 10
W#1 DoublesReina Visaya / Aureana Wong vs Noel Salter / Emily John6-3, 6-1
2025-07-13vs KRC Summer CampLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaasi Nakasone / Aureana Wong vs Shannon Rogers / Katelyn Sweeney Ching5-7, 2-6
2025-07-06vs Triple the FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaasi Nakasone / Haley Fujimori vs Shaina Yeung / Melissa Ching6-2, 6-0
2025-06-29vs SLammersWon 10
W#1 DoublesReina Visaya / Aureana Wong vs Molly Lammers / Earline Racoma6-2, 6-1
2025-06-22vs Deuces WilderWon 10
W#1 DoublesReina Visaya / Aureana Wong vs Emily John / Noel Salter6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ace Ace In Your Face7171350
2Triple the Fun5353764
3KRC Summer Camp5353967
4SLammers35351177
5Deuces Wilder08081694

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.36 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Reina Visaya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Caasi Nakasone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Aureana Wong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Haley Fujimori
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Irene Ma
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reina Visaya + Aureana Wong28265% games+7.1% vs expected
Caasi Nakasone + Aureana Wong224 matchesnot enough data
Caasi Nakasone + Haley Fujimori303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Reina Visaya
81W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
4.42
4.5
Caasi Nakasone
135W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Aureana Wong
48W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
Haley Fujimori
19W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Irene Ma
20W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.