Teams

Young/LF 18s 2.5W

2026 TUL ADULT 18 & Over League · 2.5 WOMEN

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-10vs Lott/FR 18s 2.5WSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKatherine Hofland vs Jillian Kline6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMakenzie Howard / Hannah Irvine vs Amy Barnes / Bailey Robson1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-27vs Manlandro/LF 18s 2.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesKatherine Hofland / Madison Telarik vs Macy Reasor / Yvette Tabor6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEdith Gonzalez vs Melanie Lovelace6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMakenzie Howard / Brittany Ozaras vs Erika Manlandro / Karah Franklin6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-26vs Orange 2/McCaskill/LF/2.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Craft / Michelle Walker vs Tracy Beswick / Tia Hill4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBrittany Ozaras vs Terryn Milton2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Bedrosian / Jordi Hall vs Sarah Lueck / Robin Hoskins6-3, 6-4
2026-04-29vs Gray/LF 2.5 WWon 21
L#1 DoublesJamie Jones / Kristin Robert vs Lindsay Gray / Meredith Fazel1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEdith Gonzalez vs Erica Healey6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Bedrosian / Jordi Hall vs Whitney Rodich / Stacy Dickinson6-4, 6-3
2026-04-16vs Ruefly 2.5W/LFWon 21
L#1 DoublesThuy Bui / Nicole Bedrosian vs Tracey Farmer / Claire O'meilia0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesHannah Irvine vs Janell Miller6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMadison Telarik / Edith Gonzalez vs Cathy Hodgs / Diane Baldridge6-3, 6-0
2026-04-16vs Siddall/SH 2.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesThuy Bui / Katherine Hofland vs Samantha Renner / Laura Woodward4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMadison Telarik vs Madison Graves6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGrace Young / Makenzie Howard vs Sarah Clavin / Stephanie Gibbs1-6, 3-6
2026-04-07vs Orange 1/Labadie/GR/18s 2.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesMakenzie Howard / Madison Telarik vs Kristen Lewellen / Sarah Isbell4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBrittany Ozaras vs Ashley Brown1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGrace Young / Jordi Hall vs Caitlin Shores / Brittney Stephens6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-31vs Coker/LF/18s 2.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesJamie Jones / Hannah Irvine vs Holly Raley / Leslie Southerland7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLauren Craft vs Stacey Coker6-4, 6-0
2026-03-23vs Hutto/LF/2.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Walker / Brittany Ozaras vs Gwenita Lawrence / Carla Grogg6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMakenzie Howard vs Patty Eaton0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEdith Gonzalez / Katherine Hofland vs Rhonda Stevens / Elizabeth Beaubien6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings21 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Orange 1/Labadie/GR/18s 2.5W9022513172
2OK/Cole/18&over 2.5W9124615174
3Orange 2/McCaskill/LF/2.5W8120721212
4Green 2/Witkowski/TU 18s 2.5W8224616195
5Johnson/LF2.5W82191126238
6Welch/TTC/18s 2.5W73191129255
7Siddall/SH 2.5W6219513154
8Young/LF 18s 2.5W63151225218
9Horvath/LF 2.5W64161431255
10Lott/FR 18s 2.5W45121532242
11Coker/LF/18s 2.5W45111634249
12Arnold/LF 2.5W46141632259
13Smith/LF/2.5W46131739271
14Croll/LF/2.5W46121840300
15Manlandro/LF 18s 2.536111633257
16Hutto/LF/2.5W2791839277
17Crowley/IS/2.5W28102041275
18Martindale/GR 18s 2.5W2892143296
19Gray/LF 2.5 W1671430203
20Cogan/LF 18s 2.5W1952551319
21Ruefly 2.5W/LF0832143264

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.45
Hannah Irvine
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.43
Madison Telarik
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.41
Edith Gonzalez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Jordi Hall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Katherine Hofland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.26
Lauren Craft
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
1.89
Brittany Ozaras
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.86
Nicole Bedrosian
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.82
Makenzie Howard
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Jamie Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Robert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Irvine
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.45
Madison Telarik
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%70%30%
2.43
Edith Gonzalez
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.41
Jordi Hall
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
Katherine Hofland
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Lauren Craft
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Brittany Ozaras
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Nicole Bedrosian
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Makenzie Howard
1W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Jamie Jones
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristin Robert
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.