Teams

KNO RED

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-17vs HW BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesCathy Nowak / Linda Prudhomme vs Susan Wist / Krissie Marotto5-2
W#3 DoublesShelley Maloney / Elizabeth Barber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-10vs KC-RH YELLOWLost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Madden / Shelley Maloney vs Sally Heaton / Jacqueline Hancock3-6, 0-6
2023-07-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Prudhomme / Lori Roach vs Michelle Wiley / Jodi Mann5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-26vs LEBTC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Prudhomme / Cathy Nowak vs Robyn Jensen / Philippa Biggi3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesShelley Maloney / Julie Madden vs Janee Wren / Deborah Jenson0-6, 1-6
2023-06-24vs HV BLUESplit 11
W#2 DoublesJessica Hunt / Linda Prudhomme vs Robyn Jones / Anna Larsen7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori Roach / Shelley Maloney vs Dana Chorpenning / Margo Ellis4-6, 3-6
2023-06-19vs HFII REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Madden / Shelley Maloney vs Danielle Drohan / Sarah Hunter1-6, 2-6
2023-06-18vs SS-H BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesLinda Prudhomme / Lori Roach vs Linda Backus / Debbie Sabato6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Sheila Edwards
published
2.79
Shelley Maloney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Barb Richards
published 3
2.73
Jessica Hunt
published
2.65
Linda Prudhomme
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.62
Cathy Nowak
published 3
2.52
Julie Madden
published
Lori Roach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Nowak + Linda Prudhomme4545% games−3.8% vs expected
Jessica Hunt + Linda Prudhomme2339% games−10.7% vs expected
Sheila Edwards + Cathy Nowak2342% games−17.2% vs expected
Barb Richards + Cathy Nowak213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheila Edwards
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Shelley Maloney
48W–35L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Barb Richards
94W–77L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79
Jessica Hunt
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Linda Prudhomme
88W–90L career · 5 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
2.65
3
Cathy Nowak
20W–29L career · no lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
2.62
Julie Madden
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Lori Roach
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.