Teams

SD 3.5 Mtn View/ Irving

2023 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SD WE · SD - Women - 3.5 WE (SD

8 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-26vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ LeshSplit 11
L#1 DoublesValeria Moore / Amy Rorstad vs Yvonne Hwang / Ana Chapman5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAlmira MacIas vs Yvonne Bentle1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-12Won 20
W#1 SinglesAmy Rorstad vs Cyndi Smith6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlmira MacIas / Aida Padilla vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-05vs SD WE LLW 3.5 SDTRC/ MonzonLost 01
L#1 SinglesAlmira MacIas vs Amy Hamric2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-02-26vs SD 3.5 Balboa TC/ EdwardsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMer Chiodo / Aida Padilla vs Anna Brigham / Tori Penick0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Rorstad vs Candace Gyure6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-12Won 10
W#1 SinglesAlmira MacIas vs TOMOKO BALKO2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-02-05vs SD WE LLW 3.5 SDTRC/ MonzonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichele Kelley / Amy Rorstad vs Donna Dube / Erica Meyer2-6, 2-6
2023-01-22vs SD 3.5 Balboa TC/ EdwardsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMer Chiodo / Amy Rorstad vs Debra McKeon / Mia Scavone6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlmira MacIas / Aida Padilla vs Candace Gyure / Lisa Mallory5-7, 2-6
2023-01-08vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ CorbittSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Rorstad / Valeria Moore vs JACQUELINE SAENZ / Sara Fairbank1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAlmira MacIas vs Paola Romo6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 WE (SD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Nicole Earnhardt
published
3.37
Almira MacIas
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Mer Chiodo
published
2.96
2.86
Michele Kelley
published
2.80
Amy Rorstad
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Evelyn Irving
published 3
2.56
Aida Padilla
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Rorstad + Almira MacIas7351% gamesnot enough data
Michele Kelley + Amy Rorstad303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Earnhardt
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Almira MacIas
56W–60L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Mer Chiodo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Frances Simpson Lang
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Michele Kelley
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Amy Rorstad
82W–150L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Evelyn Irving
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Aida Padilla
54W–135L career · 3 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.