Teams

Carol Rollins

2025 Springfield Adult 18 & Over Fall Leagues · 3.5 Fall Adult Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-03vs Tami MurphyWon 20
W#1 DoublesVicki Brinck / Jennifer Feller vs Jo Sherbo / Megan Terry6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarol Rollins / Melissa Cox vs Lacey Quale / Catherine Schmittling6-0, 6-1
2024-10-27vs Tami MurphyWon 21
L#1 DoublesVicki Brinck / Jennifer Feller vs Emmilyn Murphy / Tami Murphy4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesJane Gardner vs Megan Terry6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMelissa Cox / Carol Rollins vs Deb Jochems / Jo Sherbo6-3, 6-2
2024-10-20vs Tami MurphySplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarol Rollins / Stephanie Wachob vs Tami Murphy / Emmilyn Murphy1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Cox / Jane Gardner vs Megan Terry / Catherine Schmittling6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-13vs Tami MurphyLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Rollins / Stephanie Wachob vs Emmilyn Murphy / Tami Murphy3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Feller vs Lacey Quale6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJane Gardner / Colleen Justus vs Deb Jochems / Jo Sherbo6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2024-10-06vs Tami MurphyWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Rollins / Stephanie Wachob vs Jo Sherbo / Carolyn Hanger6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Feller / Jane Gardner vs Lacey Quale / Catherine Schmittling6-1, 6-3
2024-09-29vs Tami MurphyLost 12
L#1 DoublesVicki Brinck / Stephanie Wachob vs Tami Murphy / Emmilyn Murphy2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJane Gardner vs Lacey Quale6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Feller / Carol Rollins vs Carolyn Hanger / Deb Jochems6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Fall Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Jennifer Feller
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
3.32
Stephanie Wachob
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.08
Carol Rollins
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Jane Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.98
Vicki Brinck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Colleen Justus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Melissa Cox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Feller + Stephanie Wachob3261% games+10.9% vs expected
Carol Rollins + Stephanie Wachob5257% games+3.8% vs expected
Carol Rollins + Jennifer Feller314 matchesnot enough data
Carol Rollins + Jane Gardner134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Feller
25W–16L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Stephanie Wachob
55W–57L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Carol Rollins
37W–43L career · 9 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.08
Jane Gardner
49W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.03
Vicki Brinck
43W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Colleen Justus
12W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Cox
22W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.