Teams

Coopwood/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.5 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.30 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-16vs Miller/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesOsaretin Asemota / Chad Alford vs Rollin Riggs / Praveen Kumar G6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSamuel Corcoran vs Reid Corcoran6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLeo Brown vs Floriano Novoa6-1, 6-0
2024-11-11vs Cooper/MemphisLost 04
L#1 DoublesRyan Coopwood / Chad Alford vs Kevin Gallimore / Dylan Plumlee3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesEstefan Perez vs Jeffery Suber7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCorey Richter / Alan Kirk vs Joseph Springer / John Heard2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGarrett Weinberg / Natrez Crawford vs Kevin Roedel / Rob Dannemiller1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Garrett Meggs
published
3.05
Matt Stark
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.04
Chad Alford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Chris Garner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Reid Stuart
published
2.99
Alan Kirk
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.99
Samuel Corcoran
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.96
Ryan Coopwood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.95
Corey Richter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Garrett Weinberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Alan Willis
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Elliot Kiersky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Estefan Perez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Leo Brown
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Natrez Crawford
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Osaretin Asemota
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alan Kirk + Matt Stark2547% games+0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Garrett Meggs
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Matt Stark
15W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3.5
Chad Alford
6W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Chris Garner
11W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Reid Stuart
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3.5
Alan Kirk
11W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Samuel Corcoran
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Ryan Coopwood
28W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Corey Richter
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Garrett Weinberg
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Alan Willis
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Elliot Kiersky
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Estefan Perez
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leo Brown
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Natrez Crawford
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Osaretin Asemota
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.