← Teams

SAC-Wheeler/Fraser

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.22 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Craig Frasier
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.22
Jeff Wheeler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Charles Gebhardt
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
John Bergin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Donny Cablao
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Jeff Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Daniel Rousseau
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.73
Brian Harvey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Dave Sato
published 3
Results8 ties
2025-05-08Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesRobin Olson / Jeff Wheeler vs Mark Hudspeth / JOHN KNOX6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Harvey / Daniel Rousseau vs Dave Hall / Matthew Casimo6-4, 6-4
2025-05-01Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRobin Olson / Daniel Rousseau vs Gerald Chase / Dan Wolff7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonny Cablao / Brian Harvey vs Dale Vandenburgh / Steve Douglas7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCraig Frasier / John Bergin vs Douglas Metzker / Tommy Atkins6-3, 7-6
2025-04-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRobin Olson / Jeff Wheeler vs Edwin Becker / Jim DeWeese6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCraig Frasier / John Bergin vs Peter Monsantofils / Michael Archer6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Gebhardt / Brian Harvey vs Joe Gallagher / Paul Kachel6-4, 6-2
2025-04-17Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRobin Olson / Jeff Wheeler vs Kevin Young / William Reykalin6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCraig Frasier / John Bergin vs Tony Humpage / Chip Burczak6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrian Harvey / Jeff Gonzales vs Jeffrey Bayless / Mike Delman6-0, 6-3
2025-04-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCraig Frasier / Jeff Wheeler vs Hayward Reed / Bruce Yang5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWayne Sells / John Bergin vs Robert Shevlin / Dan Wendling6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeff Gonzales / Donny Cablao vs John Wallin / Richard Tippets3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-01Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCraig Frasier / Jeff Wheeler vs Kirk Planck / James Takahashi6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDaniel Rousseau / Donny Cablao vs Aaron Bowman / Neal Burgstahler7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Gebhardt / Brian Harvey vs Richard Gronostajski / Ken Dragoon6-1, 7-6
2025-03-28Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCraig Frasier / Jeff Wheeler vs Alan Potts / Andrew Kitchen6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCharles Gebhardt / Daniel Rousseau vs Mark Becker / Greg van Gasse6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Bergin / Wayne Sells vs William Pettis / Mitchell Todd6-2, 6-3
2025-03-20Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDonny Cablao / Craig Frasier vs Alan Jones / Mister Archedon3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDaniel Rousseau / John Bergin vs Evan Cohn / Robert Piercy6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCharles Gebhardt / Brian Harvey vs Charles Stewart / Steven Darling3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Craig Frasier
108W–75L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jeff Wheeler
30W–51L career
4%96%1%
3.22
3.5
Charles Gebhardt
12W–25L career
14%83%2%
3.18
3.5
John Bergin
16W–27L career
17%82%1%
3.13
3
Donny Cablao
42W–50L career
0%85%15%
2.92
3
Jeff Gonzales
19W–58L career
0%98%2%
2.83
3
Daniel Rousseau
4W–12L career
8%87%5%
2.75
3
Brian Harvey
15W–20L career
4%95%1%
2.73
3
Dave Sato
40W–110L career
31%69%0%
2.51

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.